RSS

Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists

By Rostislav ISCHENKO (Ukraine)

Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists

The paradox of the current global crisis is that for the last five years, all relatively responsible and independent nations have made tremendous efforts to save the United States from the financial, economic, military, and political disaster that looms ahead. And this is all despite Washington’s equally systematic moves to destabilize the world order, rightly known as the Pax Americana.

Since policy is not a zero-sum game, i.e., one participant’s loss does not necessarily entail a gain for another, this paradox has a logical explanation. A crisis erupts within any system when there is a discrepancy between its internal structure and the sum total of available resources (that is, those resources will eventually prove inadequate for the system to function normally and in the usual way).

There are at least three basic options for addressing this situation:

  1. Through reform, in which the system’s internal structure evolves in such a way as to better correspond to the available resources.
  2. Through the system’s collapse, in which the same result is achieved via revolution.
  3. Through preservation, in which the inputs threatening the system are eliminated by force, and the relationships within the system are carefully preserved on an inequitable relationship basis (whether between classes, social strata, castes, or nations).

The preservation method was attempted by the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, as well as the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan. It was utilized successfully (in the 19th century) prior to the era of capitalist globalization. But neither of those Eastern civilizations (although fairly robust internally) survived their collision with the technologically more advanced (and hence more militarily and politically powerful) European civilization. Japan found its answer on the path of modernization (reform) back in the second half of the 19th century, China spent a century immersed in the quagmire of semi-colonial dependence and bloody civil wars, until the new leadership of Deng Xiaoping was able to articulate its own vision of modernizing reforms.

This point leads us to the conclusion that a system can be preserved only if it is safeguarded from any unwanted external influences, i.e., if it controls the globalized world.

The contradiction between the concept of escaping the crisis, which has been adopted the US elite, and the alternative concept – proposed by Russia and backed by China, then by the BRICS nations and now a large part of the world – lay in the fact that the politicians in Washington were working from the premise that they are able to fully control the globalized world and guide its development in the direction they wish. Therefore, faced with dwindling resources to sustain the mechanisms that perpetuate their global hegemony, they tried to resolve the problem by forcefully suppressing potential opponents in order to reallocate global resources in their favor.

us-obama_1962139bIf successful, the United States would be able to reenact the events of the late 1980s – early 1990s, when the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global socialist system under its control allowed the West to escape its crisis. At this new stage, it has become a question of no longer simply reallocating resources in favor of the West as a collective whole, but solely in favor of the United States. This move offered the system a respite that could be used to create a regime for preserving inequitable relationships, during which the American elite’s definitive control over the resources of power, raw materials, finance, and industrial resources safeguarded them from the danger of the system’s internal implosion, while the elimination of alternative power centers shielded the system from external breaches, rendering it eternal (at least for a historically foreseeable period of time).

The alternative approach postulated that the system’s total resources might be depleted before the United States can manage to generate the mechanisms to perpetuate its global hegemony. In turn, this will lead to strain (and overstrain) on the forces that ensure the imperial suppression of those nations existing on the global periphery, all in the interests of the Washington-based center, which will later bring about the inevitable collapse of the system.

Two hundred, or even one hundred years ago, politicians would have acted on the principle of “what is falling, that one should also push” and prepared to divvy up the legacy of yet another crumbling empire. However, the globalization of not only the world’s industry and trade (that was achieved by the end of the 19th century), but also global finance, caused the collapse of the American empire through a policy that was extremely dangerous and costly for the whole world. To put it bluntly, the United States could bury civilization under its own wreckage.

Consequently, the Russian-Chinese approach has made a point of offering Washington a compromise option that endorses the gradual, evolutionary erosion of American hegemony, plus the incremental reform of international financial, economic, military, and political relations on the basis of the existing system of international law.

America’s elite have been offered a “soft landing” that would preserve much of their influence and assets, while gradually adapting the system to better correspond to the present facts of life (bringing it into line with the available reserve of resources), taking into account the interests of humanity, and not only of its “top echelon” as exemplified by the “300 families” who are actually dwindling to no more than thirty.

In the end, it is always better to negotiate than to build a new world upon the ashes of the old. Especially since there has been a global precedent for similar agreements.

warlongUp until 2015, America’s elite (or at least the ones who determine US policy) had been assured that they possessed sufficient financial, economic, military, and political strength to cripple the rest of the world, while still preserving Washington’s hegemony by depriving everyone, including (at the final stage) even the American people of any real political sovereignty or economic rights. European bureaucrats were important allies for that elite – i.e., the cosmopolitan, comprador-bourgeoisie sector of the EU elite, whose welfare hinged on the further integration of transatlantic (i.e., under US control) EU entities (in which the premise of Atlantic solidarity has become geopolitical dogma) and NATO, although this is in conflict with the interests of the EU member states.

However, the crisis in Ukraine, which has dragged on much longer than originally planned, Russia’s impressive surge of military and political energy as it moved to resolve the Syrian crisis (something for which the US did not have an appropriate response) and, most important, the progressive creation of alternative financial and economic entities that call into question the dollar’s position as the de facto world currency, have forced a sector of America’s elite that is amenable to compromise to rouse itself (over the last 15 years that elite has been effectively excluded from participation in any strategic decisions).

The latest statements by Kerry  and Obama which seesaw from a willingness to consider a mutually acceptable compromise on all contentious issues (even Kiev was given instructions “to implement Minsk “) to a determination to continue the policy of confrontation – are evidence of the escalating battle being fought within the Washington establishment.

It is impossible to predict the outcome of this struggle – too many high-status politicians and influential families have tied their futures to an agenda that preserves imperial domination for that to be renounced painlessly. In reality, multibillion-dollar positions and entire political dynasties are at stake.

However, we can say with absolute certainty that there is a certain window of opportunity during which any decision can be made. And a window of opportunity is closing that would allow the US to make a soft landing with a few trade-offs. The Washington elite cannot escape the fact that they are up against far more serious problems than those of 10-15 years ago. Right now the big question is about how they are going to land, and although that landing will already be harder than it would have been and will come with costs, the situation is not yet a disaster.

But the US needs to think fast. Their resources are shrinking much faster than the authors of the plan for imperial preservation had expected. To their loss of control over the BRICS countries can be added the incipient, but still fairly rapid loss of control over EU policy as well as the onset of geopolitical maneuvering among the monarchies of the Middle East. The financial and economic entities created and set in motion by the BRICS nations are developing in accordance with their own logic, and Moscow and Beijing are not able to delay their development overlong while waiting for the US to suddenly discover a capacity to negotiate.

The point of no return will pass once and for all sometime in 2016, and America’s elite will no longer be able to choose between the provisions of compromise and collapse. The only thing that they will then be able to do is to slam the door loudly, trying to drag the rest of the world after them into the abyss.

Rostislav Ischenko is the President of Centre for System Analysis and Forecasting (Kiev) currently living in Moscow.

Source in Russian: Politexpert

Adapted and translated by ORIENTAL REVIEW.

Print Friendly

Comments

comments

, ,

This post was written by:

- who has written 1319 posts on Oriental Review.


Contact the author

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Paulo Says:

    Excellent reading, thank you. An interesting and unusual angle from where to analyse this complex subject.

  2. Vladimir Zinn Says:

    “Russia’s impressive surge of military and political energy as it moved to resolve the Syrian crisis (something for which the US did not have an appropriate response) and, most important, the progressive creation of alternative financial and economic entities that call into question the dollar’s position as the de facto world currency, have forced a sector of America’s elite that is amenable to compromise to rouse itself (over the last 15 years that elite has been effectively excluded from participation in any strategic decisions).”

    This seems to imply that Russia is actually flexing it’s muscle. That is quite an interesting take. In 2010 Ukraine was solidly within the Russian sphere of influence, as was Syria, oil was at well over $80 a barrel and $50 billion was being spent on the Olympics in Sochi. Today Russia has lost Kiev and is fighting an insurgency just to keep Donbass. Sure, they took Crimea, but they already had it. They are fighting another war in Syria to hold on to it, oil is at $40 a barrel, the Russian economy is in a severe recession, and inflation is over 15%. This is power?

    Imagine through regime change a government hostile to the US was in power in Canada and the US was fighting a civil war in Mexico to keep it’s ally in power, would that be considered a powerful position?

    China is clearly a different story, but under no circumstances should a weak and desperate Russian regime be compared to China. China and Russia are on two completely different paths.

  3. smukster Says:

    A very interesting article, as everything Mr. Ischenko writes.
    My hope is that the rest of the world understands that a soft and gradual transition is in everyone’s best interest, and that this might require a willingness to compromise for some years to come. There’s no use in being “right” if this leads to massive destruction, and while the hard line faction is in retreat in DC, they are far from gone and could gain ground in the event of any external shock.

18 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists | GeoPol Intelligence Says:

    […] Like Loading… SOURCEorientalreview […]

  2. Time Running Out for Pax Americana Apologists – Rostislav Ishchenko | Timber Exec Says:

    […] appeared at Politexpert and translated at […]

  3. Il tempo scade per la Pax Americana | Aurora Says:

    […] Ishenko (Ucraina) Politexpert – Oriental Review 11 novembre […]

  4. Il tempo scade per la Pax Americana Says:

    […] […]

  5. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | CAPITOL ZERO Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  6. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | Timber Exec Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  7. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | JPPress Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  8. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | QuestorSystems.com Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  9. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | NewZSentinel Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  10. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | State of Globe Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  11. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana | Golden Gate Daily Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  12. Today’s News November 15, 2015 | Fiat Planet Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  13. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana - News Near You | Latest Trending News Says:

    […] Submitted by Rostislav Ischenko via The Oriental Review, […]

  14. Time Is running out for Pax Americana’s apologists « In These New Times Says:

    […] Oriental Review […]

  15. Today,s Thought Says:

    […] Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists […]

  16. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists | wchildblog Says:

    […] The Oriental Review, by Rostislav ISCHENKO […]

  17. De tijd dringt voor de verdedigers van de Pax Americana – NovayaGazeta.NL Says:

    […] publicatie op orientalreview.org Door Rostislav Ischenko […]

  18. Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists | EndTheIllusion.com Says:

    […] Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists by Rostislav Ischenko Posted November 16, 2015 […]

Leave a Reply