The Reverse Brzezinski: The Ultimate Eurasian Dilemma (I)


A global shift in US strategy is currently underway, with America transitioning from the ‘world policeman’ to the Lead From Behind mastermind. This fundamental shift essentially entails the US moving from a majority forward-operating military to a defensive stay-behind force. Part of this transformation is the reduction of the conventional military and its replacement with special forces and intelligence recruits. Private military companies (PMCs) are also occupying a higher role in the US’ grand strategy. Of course, it is not to say that the US no longer has the capability or will to forward advance – not at all – but that the evolving US strategy prefers more indirect and nefarious approaches towards projecting power besides massive invasions and bombing runs. In this manner, it is following the advice of Sun Tzu who wrote that “supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.” The outcome is a mixture of Color Revolutions, unconventional warfare, and mercenary interventions that avoids the direct use of US combat troops while relying heavily on regional allies’ proxy involvement. This results in the promotion of American policy via oblique methods and the retention of relative plausible deniability. Importantly, the absence of conventional forces is thought to reduce the risk of a direct confrontation between the US and Russia, China, and Iran, the primary targets of these proxy wars.

The Eurasian-wide plan of strategic destabilization and state fracturing owes its genesis to Zbigniew Brzezinski and his Eurasian Balkans concept. The US is flexible in practicing this concept, and it does not meet a dead end if the destabilization encounters an obstacle and cannot be advanced. Should this occur, as it has in Ukraine, Syria and Iraq, and possibly soon in the South China Sea, the stratagem evolves into maximizing the chaos within the launch pad states that are positioned on the doorsteps of the Eurasian Powers. The idea is to create ‘black holes’ of absolute disorder in which Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran are “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” intervene. Ideally, the US prefers that its intended targets are sucked into a quagmire that bleeds them dry and destabilizes them at home, per the example of the Soviet-Afghan War which Brzezinski conspired over 30 years ago. Moving away from the expansive Eurasian Balkans and reverting to the roots of ‘Afghan anarchy’ is the nature of the Reverse Brzezinski, and it poses the ultimate dilemma-like trap for the Eurasian Powers.

The Afghan Prototype:

US-sponsored mujahedin in 1984 (Afghanistan).
US-sponsored mujahedin in 1984 (Afghanistan).

The US’ experience in training and arming the Mujahideen to bring about and manage the Soviet-Afghan War can be seen as the first foray into the Lead From Behind strategy. The US worked hand-in-hand with Pakistan and other Muslim states to sow the seeds of chaos in Afghanistan (including the creation of the international mercenary organization Al Qaeda), thus creating a strategic destabilization so tempting that the Soviet Union could not resist the urge to intervene. This was the goal all along and it was a resounding success. It also the pinnacle of Cold War-era proxy warfare that meshed perfectly with the international balance of power at the time. It was so successful that it is credited as one of the contributing factors to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. This altered the global power balance and resulted in the US’ unipolar moment. During this period of time, the Afghan Lead From Behind prototype was no longer seen as necessary because the US now had the power, will, and opportunity to project power directly and forcefully all across the world.

The Unipolar Moment of Shock and Awe:

Drunk with power after emerging victorious from the Cold War, the US began a spate of military interventions beginning with the First Gulf War. Although marketed as a multilateral operation, the US was the primary participant in the warring coalition. Within a few years, the US was then bombing Serbian positions in Bosnia before initiating a unilateral NATO war in Serbia’s Kosovo province. It was the bombing of Serbia that awakened Russian decision makers to the need to defend their country from future threats, thus beginning a commitment towards modernizing its defense industry in order to deter a direct American/NATO attack against Russian interests. Nonetheless, this did not result in an immediate change, and in the meantime, the US’ power had yet to climax.

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the US undertook military operations and a subsequent occupation of Afghanistan, a country situated halfway across the world and near the Heartland of Eurasia. This massive expansion of American military might and reach inside the continent was unprecedented, yet even that did not mark the highlight of the post-Cold War era. The epitome of the unipolar moment was actually the 2003 Shock and Awe campaign in Iraq. During that time, the US massively bombarded Iraq in a show of force definitely made to remind the rest of the world of the US’ sole superpower status. It also deployed incredible amounts of troops and weaponry into the Mideast. Ironically enough, the subsequent financial and opportunity costs of the war and occupation would play a strong role in decreasing American power and allowing other countries such as Russia and China to catch up in challenging and defending against the US within their own spheres of interest.

Map of the Eurasian Balkans "war on terrorism" from the book The Grand Chessboard by Brzezinski. page 124. 1997
Map of the Eurasian Balkans “war on terrorism” from the book The Grand Chessboard by Brzezinski. page 124. 1997

The Eurasian Balkans:

It was at the middle of the unipolar moment in 1997 that Brzezinski authored “The Grand Chessboard” in which he laid out the US’ geostrategic priorities for Eurasia and how to best achieve them. He postulated that it was imperative for the US to retain a commanding influence over Eurasia, and that one of the best ways to do this was to prevent collusion between Russia and China. The strategic ‘Balkanizing’ of societies across the Eurasian landmass is a pivotal means of destabilizing the entire continent. If taken to its logical end, it is envisioned to create a tidal wave of ethnic, religious, and political anarchy that can crash into and dismember the diverse civilizations of Russia, China, and Iran. In some aspects, the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and their chaotic aftermath can be seen as following the philosophic dictates of this principle. The US has also historically undertaken regime change operations as a method of advancing continental destabilization and pushing Western power deeper into Eurasia.

Regime Change:

Regime change has always been a characteristic of American foreign policy, owing back to the covert overthrow of the Syrian government in 1949. Since then, it has been estimated that the CIA has overthrown or attempted to overthrow over 50 governments, although it has only admitted to 7 of them. Regime change can be either direct or indirect. Pertaining to the former, one can look at the examples of Panama in 1989 or Iraq in 2003, whereas the latter can be witnessed by the 1953 Iranian coup or the trail of Color Revolutions.

As can be evidenced from the recent Ukrainian coup, regime change today can be as cheap as only $5 billion, a fraction of the cost that it would have taken to directly overthrow Yanukovich and invade the country. Additionally, owing to international circumstances and the resurgence of Russian military might and will, it may not have been possible for the US to do so without risking a major war. Therefore, covert regime change operations are seen as preferable when the interests of other Great Powers are at stake. It is very important for the new leadership to have perceived legitimacy within the international community following the coup. Seeing as how Western democracy is viewed as a legitimate governing standard, pro-Western Color Revolutions are the optimal method of regime change among targeted states not currently practicing this form of government.

Color Revolutions:

Color Revolutions are outside-supported pro-Western coups. They specifically use the tools of social media and NGOs to infiltrate societies, increase their ranks, and expand their efficiency after the regime change operation has been commenced. Because they typically manipulate large groups of people, they create the illusion of a broad grassroots movement of disaffected masses rising up against a tyrannical dictatorship. This misleading perception enables the coup attempt to gain wide support and acceptance among the Western community, and it also denigrates the legitimate authorities that are trying to put down the illegal overthrow. The manipulation-prone masses are drawn to the street movements largely as a result of Gene Sharp’s tactics, which adroitly seek to amplify social protest movements to their maximum possible extent.

This new method of warfare is extremely effective because it presents a startling dilemma for the affected state – does the leadership use force against the civilian protesters (de-facto human shields unaware that they are being politically manipulated) in order to strike at the militant Right Sektor-esque core? And with the eyes of the Western media following the developments, can the government afford to be isolated from that community of nations if it legally defends itself? Thus, Color Revolutions present a strategic Catch-22 for the targeted government, and it is therefore not difficult to see why they had been deployed all across the post-Soviet space and beyond. They have replaced ‘traditional’ CIA coup action and have become the modus operandi of covert regime change.

To be continued…

Andrew Korybko is the American political correspondent of Voice of Russia who currently lives and studies in Moscow, exclusively for ORIENTAL REVIEW.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  1. Pingback: Les USA jonglent entre chaos et coordination pour contenir la Chine – Reveille toi

  2. Pingback: Vatican clergy and Ukrainian nationalism (I) | Oriental Review

  3. Pingback: Vatican clergy and Ukrainian nationalism (I)

  4. Pingback: Pope Francis Is The World’s Most Influential Agent Of Ukrainian Nationalism | The Vineyard of the Saker

  5. Pingback: TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » New Strategic Calculus for the Balkans (II)

  6. Pingback: NATO’s Black Sea bloc gets busy (I) | Oriental Review

  7. Pingback: NATO’s Black Sea Bloc: Spreading The “New Cold War” Beyond Eastern Europe Into New Theaters | EMerging Equity

  8. Pingback: NATO Strategy: Use Small European Countries as Proxies for War with Russia – Andrew Korybko | Timber Exec

  9. Pingback: American plan for a South Asian “Kosovo” in Rohingyaland (II) | Oriental Review

  10. Pingback: The American Plan for a South Asian “Kosovo” In Rohingyaland | Din Merican: the Malaysian DJ Blogger

  11. Pingback: Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global

  12. Pingback: A “Secular ISIL” Rises In Southeast Asia (II) | Oriental Review

  13. Pingback: Patrick Cockburn wants us to be very afraid of ISIS | OffGuardian

  14. Pingback: Nuland’s Plan For The Balkans (And How It Can Dramatically Backfire) – Part II | The Vineyard of the Saker

  15. Pingback: Nuland’s Plan For The Balkans (And How It Can Dramatically Backfire) – Part I/II | TheFlippinTruth

  16. Pingback: ” NULAND & KAGAN-KRIEGSSEUCHE 1und 2 “ | Egon Tech Blog

  17. Pingback: Asian NATO-like project to be stopped (I) | Oriental Review

  18. Pingback: “The New Middle East”: Russian Style (I) | Oriental Review

  19. Pingback: “The New Middle East” : Russian Style | Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

  20. Pingback: The Croatian-Serbian Missile Race | Oriental Review

  21. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 1. The Law Of Hybrid Warfare | Oriental Review

  22. Pingback: The new genre of warfare | TACSTRAT

  23. Pingback: Hybrid Wars Part 1: Disrupting Multipolarism Through Provoked Conflict | THE UNHIVED MIND III

  24. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 1. La loi de la guerre hybride | Réseau International

  25. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 1. The Law Of Hybrid Warfare | Réseau International (english)

  26. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 2. Testons la théorie en Syrie et en Ukraine | Réseau International

  27. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 1. The Law Of Hybrid Warfare- by Andrew Korybko - GPOLIT

  28. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 4. Dans le grand Heartland (V) | Réseau International

  29. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 5. Briser les Balkans (IV) | Réseau International

  30. Pingback: Guerres hybrides: 5. Briser les Balkans (V) | Réseau International

  31. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 2. Testons la théorie en Syrie et en Ukraine | Arrêt sur Info

  32. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 6. Trick To Containing China (VII) | Oriental Review

  33. The history of the main NATO partners clearly explains the fascist activity and mentality of this criminal organization.
    During the occupation of the American continent European bandits killed about 25 mln. American Indians, the others have been put in concentration camps Reservation where they have been kept until now, which is the Nazi style crime.
    During World War II in retaliation for the bombing of London, British and US Air Forces dropped bombs on Dresden and other German cities killing more than 100,000 civilians, including children. Many children were burned alive.
    March 10 1945 during the US bombing of Tokyo with 500 tons of incendiary bombs M-69 stuffed with napalm; over 300,000 civilians, including children, were killed.
    In 1945 to avoid combat activities, army losses and force Japan to surrender, America dropped two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. At the same time America had a plan to drop 12 more nuclear bombs on other major cities in Japan, if Japan did not surrender. About 200,000 civilians, including children, were killed and burned alive.
    In 1949, Churchill demanded that the US government drop a nuclear bomb on Moscow before the Soviet Union acquires the nuclear weapon.
    In 1959, USA developed a plan for a nuclear attack on the USSR major cities, Moscow, Leningrad and others. At that time, America had 10 times more nuclear weapons than the Soviet Union. In 1964, the US government tried to implement the plan, but a pure accident prevented that.
    In 2009, NATO has developed a new plan for attack on Russia with nuclear weapons.
    During the Vietnam War, America used napalm and chemicals against the civilian population; 3.8 mlns were killed, which is equivalent to genocide (
    In 1999, NATO bombed Serbia day and night without a break for a month using bombs with depleted uranium. The goal was the creation of the never-existed islamofascist state Kosovo on the land belonged to Serbs for centuries.
    Over million citizens, including children, have been killed by NATO’s bandits in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria.
    It should be noted that all the years’ military doctrine of America, Britain, France and NATO has been based on one principle: the total extermination of the civilian population in order to force the enemy’s army and the government to lay down arms. In other words, NATO and its main partners are criminals and must be brought before the international court.

  34. Pingback: U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One) | Geopolitical "Correctness"

  35. Pingback: TURKEY’S ANTI-DAESH OPERATION: FROM BAD TO WORST-CASE SCENARIO? | Yesterdays Prophecy Todays News

  36. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 1. The Law Of Hybrid Warfare - Africa Horn Now

  37. Pingback: The Destabilizations In Djibouti And Ethiopia Are Being Exploited Against China « Addis Ethiopia Weblog


  39. Pingback: Vatican Clergy And Ukrainian Nationalism | The GLOBAL POLITICS

  40. Pingback: New Strategic Calculus For The Balkans

  41. Pingback: Flynn’s Out: Is ‘The New Détente’ Really Dead – Or Can Russia Still Benefit? |

  42. Pingback: Has a Multipolar CENTO Sprung Up in The South Eurasian Rimland? | CommandEleven

  43. Pingback: Flynn’s Out: Is ‘The New Détente’ Really Dead – Or Can Russia Still Benefit? | Counter Information

  44. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. South Sudan’s Total Collapse Could Destroy Central And Eastern Africa | Oriental Review

  45. Pingback: South Sudan’s Total Collapse Could Lead to the Destabilization of Central and Eastern Africa | Counter Information

  46. Pingback: Guerre hybride 8. L’effondrement total du Sud-Soudan pourrait détruire l’Afrique centrale et orientale | Réseau International

  47. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. South Sudan’s Total Collapse Could Destroy Central And Eastern Africa | Réseau International (english)

  48. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America – The Deplorable Patriots

  49. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America | StockTalk Journal

  50. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America | Real Patriot News

Leave a Reply