RSS

Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I)

By Andrew KORYBKO (USA)

Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I)

The Russian-Chinese strategic partnership (RCSP), indoctrinated in 1996, is Eurasia’s geopolitical anchor in the 21st century, shaping its evolution and entrance into the Multipolar World. No other political relationship between the two continents’ actors even comes close, with the RCSP’s only formidable rival being the US via its privileged military alliances with NATO, the Gulf Kingdoms, and Japan. In this century’s struggle for the supercontinent, the interplay between the RCSP and the US will come to define global politics.

Detractors or Distracters?

Much ado has been made in the Western media about the RCSP, with some highlighting its significance in challenging the Washington Consensus and others brushing it off as nothing more than Moscow’s increasing dependency on Beijing. The views of the former are often trumpeted to scare Americans and justify their government’s aggression against Russia and China, while the latter serves to feed a disinformation campaign meant to split Russia and China apart. Only rarely is the RCSP mentioned as a cautionary warning for the US to moderate its policies, which is the most responsible way to present this development to the Western voter.

The article’s intent is to provocatively argue that the RCSP is already a worldwide reality in the making, the manifestation of Washington’s nightmare, and that it extends beyond Eurasia and even into North Africa and Latin America. It does seek to challenge the Western order, but only to help guide the transition to the Multipolar World, a goal which both countries pledged their solidarity to in 1997. The US’ reluctance in recognizing the tectonic shifts that have occurred in the world since then and its insistence on prolonging the fading unipolar moment are the largest sources of global destabilization today. Despite what the detractors try to achieve by fear mongering and the distracters by divisionary tactics, the RCSP is peaceful, defensive, and more unified than ever. By exploring the confluences of Russian-Chinese policy in key areas of Eurasia and beyond, the article will prove that the RCSP is alive and growing, actively working to steer the world closer to multipolarity.

PART I: Structure

Russia-China talks in Beijing, May 2014.

Russia-China talks in Beijing, May 2014.

Before moving on into the geopolitical details of the RCSP, one needs to identify its structural underpinnings. These are the roles of Russia and China, the basic fundamentals of their cooperation, and their institutional actions in restructuring the international order.

The Russian Balancer and the Chinese Gateway

There are certain segmented roles that both partners play through their interaction with one another. Russia acts as military and political balancer across Eurasia, providing an alternative (be it to the US or China) to all Great Powers, emerging states, and interested entities. It will be shown how Russia works in close conjunction with China to make sure that this balancing act satisfies the strategic objectives of both, sometimes playing a ‘good cop, bad cop’ dynamic. China, for its part, is on track to surpass the US as the world’s largest economy in terms of PPP this year, and it is the predominant economic power in the developing world. Its deep and privileged ties with developing agriculture and commodity markets in Africa, Latin America, and the String of Pearls states makes it a valuable economic gateway for Russia, especially in light of recent developments. Thus, what Russia can provide China in terms of military and political balancing in key global regions, China can reciprocate with economic opportunities and trade facilitation there via its already established contacts and elite networks.

Of course, the power tandem between Russia and China is far from perfect, as is its strategic application across the world, but this is the general theory of their hand-in-glove approach: Russia is the Balancer and China is the Gateway. The further that one moves from these two, for example, to the Mideast and Latin America, the more they can see the pure multipolar objectives and close coordination between these states; likewise, the closer they get to these two Eurasian cores, the more complex the relationship appears and the more difficult it may be to understand.

The Cradle of Cooperation

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is the cradle in which the RCSP was born and raised. Originally founded as the Shanghai Five in 1996, it was reformed as the SCO in 2001 with the inclusion of Uzbekistan. Since then, it has established observer cooperation with Mongolia, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran, as well as dialogue partnerships with Sri Lanka, Turkey, and Belarus. These countries directly fall into the immediate sphere of the RCSP, where either Russia or China can exert some degree or another of important nfluence to varying degrees. Also, the SCO sets out the foundations of the RCSP, listing the fight against “terrorism, separatism, and extremism in all their manifestations” (thus including Color Revolutions) as their foremost foe. It just so happens that the US engages in all of these activities in its Eurasian-wide campaign of chaos and control, thereby placing it at existential odds with Russia and China, as well as the other official members. It should not be .orgotten that the SCO regularly holds joint military drills among its members, too.

The BRICS Bastion

In what is the most visible form of the RCSP, the two countries all but cooperate as one force within the BRICS format. In May, Putin stated in regards to China that “We have common priorities both on the global and regional scale…We have agreed to coordinate our foreign policy steps more closely, including within the UN, BRICS and the APEC… We have no disagreements. On the contrary, we have vast plans that we are fully determined to translate into reality.” This groundbreaking declaration of global intent made the indispensible transition to action during the July BRICS Summit in Brazil, during which the five members founded the New Development Bank to directly confront the West’s institutional economic dominance. Important memorandums on multipolar understanding and the creation of a currency reserve pool rounded out the other important outcomes of the event. One can thus see that BRICS has become the institutional bastion of Russian-Chinese coordination all across the world.

Structure Summary

Russia and China have their own distinct roles to play within their power tandem, and they are still refining the interplay between them. The SCO, although being a multilateral framework, essentially functions as a bilateral entity for larger Russian-Chinese cooperation, using Central Asia as a practice ground for future applications elsewhere. Continuing with the institutional cooperation between Russia and China, one can most clearly see this in BRICS, most notably in the latest summit. When analyzed as a unified whole, both countries are combining their individual strengths within the proper institutions in order to pursue the shared goal of multipolarity.

To be continued…

Andrew Korybko is the American political correspondent of Voice of Russia who currently lives and studies in Moscow, exclusively for ORIENTAL REVIEW.

Print Friendly


, , , ,

This post was written by:

- who has written 1366 posts on Oriental Review.


Contact the author

0 Comments For This Post

77 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (II) | Oriental Review Says:

    […] Part I […]

  2. Agenda: expediting deviant violence - Occurrences Says:

    […] Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I) […]

  3. L’incubo di Washington diventa realtà: Il partenariato strategico russo-cinese diventa globale | Aurora Says:

    […] Korybko (USA) Oriental Review. 21 agosto […]

  4. Anonymous Says:

    […] […]

  5. L’incubo di Washington diventa realtà: Il partenariato strategico russo-cinese diventa globale Says:

    […] Korybko (USA) Oriental Review. 21 agosto […]

  6. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global | Counter Information Says:

    […] Part I […]

  7. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global | Global Research « The Progressive Mind Says:

    […] Part I […]

  8. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I) - PRN.fm - PRN.fm Says:

    […] Read more […]

  9. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I) - The Daily Coin Says:

    […] By Andrew KORYBKO, Oriental Review […]

  10. Special meeting of the European Council – Conclusions : Ukraine, Gaza, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ebola… | YERELCE Says:

    […] Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I) […]

  11. A seismic shift in globalpoltics is occurring. No dancing in the streets yet – but hope springs eternal in the human breast | The Liberty Beacon®™ England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales Says:

    […] Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I) […]

  12. Le cauchemar de Washington se précise : le partenariat stratégique entre la Russie et la Chine s’étend | Réseau International Says:

    […] Part 1 : Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global … et Part 2 : Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes […]

  13. America’s Guide To Dismantling The Multipolar World | Oriental Review Says:

    […] America – Nicaragua Canal – more so an extension of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership in Latin America than a project associated with Venezuela/Brazil, although it definitely has […]

  14. The Multipolar Network-Centric Policy Of The Eurasian Union | Oriental Review Says:

    […] Color Revolutions, this nefarious objective was apparent to Russia and China, which entered into a strategic partnership in 1997 in order to help one another build the multipolar world. Shortly thereafter, they […]

  15. How China’s Balkan Silk Road Can Resurrect South Stream | Oriental Review Says:

    […] not be discounted that Russia can also reap some resultant benefits from this as part of the global Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, which in this case, would allow for the resurrection of the South Stream project that all of its […]

  16. ‘Financial Meteorologists’ And Their Political Predictions About The Russian Economic Storm | Oriental Review Says:

    […] the damage it has in mind. Russia and China, the two anchors of the multipolar world via the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, are taking the initiative in creating an alternative institution to counter the West’s […]

  17. ‘Financial Meteorologists’ And Their Political Predictions About The Russian Economic Storm – OpEd | EMerging Equity Says:

    […] the damage it has in mind. Russia and China, the two anchors of the multipolar world via the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, are taking the initiative in creating an alternative institution to counter the West’s […]

  18. “Financial Meteorologists” And Their “Political Predictions” About Russia’s “Economic Storm” - Give Back Our Freedom Says:

    […] the damage it has in mind. Russia and China, the two anchors of the multipolar world via the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, are taking the initiative in creating an alternative institution to counter the West’s […]

  19. Le cauchemar de Washington se précise: Le partenariat stratégique entre la Russie et la Chine s’étend | Arrêt sur Info Says:

    […] Part 1 : Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global … et Part 2 : Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (II) […]

  20. Modi’s Game And The True Meaning Of Multipolarity | Oriental Review Says:

    […] that the Pentagon wants to construct all across Asia. As for Russia, India is keenly aware of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership and understands that Moscow is in no place to support New Delhi against any perceived Chinese […]

  21. The Future Of The Balkans Runs Through Macedonia I | Oriental Review Says:

    […] with Russia due to the close political coordination between Moscow and Beijing enshrined in the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. In short, the idea is for China to connect Greece with Hungary via a system of railroads that […]

  22. The Coming Color Revolution Chaos And ‘Media Crimea’ In Kyrgyzstan | Oriental Review Says:

    […] this, China’s mediation role is assured due to its strategic interests in all three actors. The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership guarantees that Moscow and Beijing have no intention of ever butting heads over something as […]

  23. Who’s won the ‘sanctions war’ so far? | Oriental Review Says:

    […] Europe from Russia, it’s totally failed in keeping Moscow and Beijing apart, and the two are now making rounds across the world in strengthening multipolarity and pushing back against the US’ designs. It is this […]

  24. Who’s Won the “Sanctions War” So Far? Washington, Brussels or Moscow? | PushBack.US Says:

    […] Russia, it’s totally failed in keeping Moscow and Beijing apart, and the two are now making rounds across the world in strengthening multipolarity and pushing back against the US’ designs. It is this […]

  25. Who’s Won the “Sanctions War” So Far? Washington, Brussels or Moscow? |  SHOAH Says:

    […] Europe from Russia, it’s totally failed in keeping Moscow and Beijing apart, and the two are now making rounds across the world in strengthening multipolarity and pushing back against the US’ designs. It is this […]

  26. EU or Russia – Who’s won the sanctions war so far? | PushBack.US Says:

    […] from Russia, it’s totally failed in keeping Moscow and Beijing apart, and the two are now making rounds across the world in strengthening multipolarity and pushing back against the US’ designs. It is this […]

  27. Who’s Won the “Sanctions War” So Far? Washington, Brussels or Moscow? | TAR News Says:

    […] Europe from Russia, it’s totally failed in keeping Moscow and Beijing apart, and the two are now making rounds across the world in strengthening multipolarity and pushing back against the US’ designs. It is this […]

  28. How Russia’s Reaching for the Stars | Oriental Review Says:

    […] that Russia feels towards China, providing further evidence of the intimate ties that underpin the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, as well as Moscow’s long-term forecast that such relations will only continue far into the […]

  29. New Strategic Calculus for the Balkans (II) | Oriental Review Says:

    […] Central Balkans and their strategic Russian and Chinese partners must publicly articulate their multipolar vision for the region, as such a strong and […]

  30. Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global Says:

    […] orientalreview.org […]

  31. TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » New Strategic Calculus for the Balkans (II) Says:

    […] Central Balkans and their strategic Russian and Chinese partners must publicly articulate their multipolar vision for the region, as such a strong and […]

  32. Battle Of The Summits: Schloss Elmau vs. Ufa | The Vineyard of the Saker Says:

    […] Russia and China have dedicated themselves to streamlining their strategic partnership into an engine for pan-Eurasian integration (which it already functioned as in the past, but not to […]

  33. How the US Plans to Defeat Eurasia « National Vanguard Says:

    […] potentially even that of Russia in the future (as well as the joint collaboration between the two strategic partners), the US has innovatively transformed its notorious Tomahawk stockpile into anti-ship […]

  34. BRAVE NEW WORLD: The Pentagon’s Robotic Warfare Arsenal – By Andrew Korybko | RIELPOLITIK Says:

    […] even that of Russia in the future (as well as the joint collaborationbetween the two strategic partners), the US has innovatively transformed its notorious Tomahawk stockpile into anti-ship […]

  35. For Russia, The Path To Laos Runs Through Vietnam | The Vineyard of the Saker Says:

    […] with the West really was. While most commentators rightfully draw attention to Russia’s growing full-spectrum relations with China , many of them neglect the fact that the country isn’t its sole partner or interest in the […]

  36. Laos is a Key Country in Russia's Pivot to Asian Integration – Andrew Kroybko | Timber Exec Says:

    […] with the West really was. While most commentators rightfully draw attention to Russia’s growing full-spectrum relations with China , many of them neglect the fact that the country isn’t its sole partner or interest in […]

  37. Laos is a Key Country in Russia's Pivot to Asian Integration - Business Recorders Russia News Says:

    […] with the West really was. While most commentators rightfully draw attention to Russia’s growing full-spectrum relations with China , many of them neglect the fact that the country isn’t its sole partner or interest in […]

  38. The Stock Shock And Economic Bipolarity | The Vineyard of the Saker Says:

    […] level (whereas the Russians can do so on the geopolitical/military-technical front, ergo their strategic partnership ). China foresees a future where multipolarity wins out over unipolarity, with the lion’s share […]

  39. Revisiting The Russia & G7 Divorce: How Moscow Came Out On Top | Oriental Review Says:

    […] reality that was forced upon it and unhesitantly moved in the opposite direction, strengthening its strategic partnership with China in order to compensate for the one that was lost with the EU. The full consequences of […]

  40. From G8 to G7, Revisiting The Russia – G7 Divorce: How Moscow Came Out On Top |  SHOAH Says:

    […] that was forced upon it and unhesitantly moved in the opposite direction, strengthening its strategic partnership with China in order to compensate for the one that was lost with the […]

  41. Pakistan Is The “Zipper” Of Pan-Eurasian Integration | Russian Institute for Strategic Studies Says:

    […] Perverted in the Western imagination as a backwards land of terrorism and poverty, the mainstream media myth about Pakistan carries little factual weight and purposely neglects the country’s rising geopolitical importance in Eurasia. Far from being a lost cause, the country is actually one of the supercontinent’s most important economic hopes, as it has the potential to connect the massive economies of the Eurasian Union, Iran, SAARC, and China, thereby inaugurating the closest thing to an integrated pan-Eurasian economic zone. Russia recognizes Pakistan’s prime geopolitical potential and has thus maneuvered to rapidly increase its full-spectrum relations with the South Asian gatekeeper. Russia’s overarching goal, as it is with all of its partners nowadays, is to provide a non-provocative balancing component to buffet Pakistan’s regional political position and assist with its peaceful integration into the multipolar Eurasian framework being constructed by the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. […]

  42. Pakistan importance in the region is undeniable | S.O.S. Kashmir Says:

    […] Perverted in the Western imagination as a backwards land of terrorism and poverty, the mainstream media myth about Pakistan carries little factual weight and purposely neglects the country’s rising geopolitical importance in Eurasia. Far from being a lost cause, the country is actually one of the supercontinent’s most important economic hopes, as it has the potential to connect the massive economies of the Eurasian Union, Iran, SAARC, and China, thereby inaugurating the closest thing to an integrated pan-Eurasian economic zone. Russia recognizes Pakistan’s prime geopolitical potential and has thus maneuvered to rapidly increase its full-spectrum relations with the South Asian gatekeeper. Russia’s overarching goal, as it is with all of its partners nowadays, is to provide a non-provocative balancing component to buffet Pakistan’s regional political position and assist with its peaceful integration into the multipolar Eurasian framework being constructed by theRussian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. […]

  43. The 4th Media » Pakistan Is The “Zipper” Of Pan-Eurasian Integration Says:

    […] Russia recognizes Pakistan’s prime geopolitical potential and has thus maneuvered to rapidly increase its full-spectrum relations with the South Asian gatekeeper. Russia’s overarching goal, as it is with all of its partners nowadays, is to provide a non-provocative balancing component to buffet Pakistan’s regional political position and assist with its peaceful integration into the multipolar Eurasian framework being constructed by the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. […]

  44. 2016 Trends and Geopolitical Forecast: Mega Analysis of Europe, Eurasia and the Middle East | Counter Information Says:

    […] exporting the country’s resources to the energy-deprived island chain. On a grander level, the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership tacitly implies that both sides can cooperate with the other’s rivals (in this case, Russia […]

  45. Asian NATO-like project to be stopped (II) | Oriental Review Says:

    […] upon this in aiding its Chinese ally’s concerns as per its tacit responsibility under the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. It’s not predicted that Russia can entirely restrain Vietnam from carrying out anti-Chinese […]

  46. Hybrid Wars 3. Predicting The Next Hybrid Wars | Oriental Review Says:

    […] sometime in the near future. Elsewhere, however, there’s no direct integrational overlap of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership except in the Balkans, but even there, the confluence of interests is less tightly connected and […]

  47. Geopolitics via CPEC - Think Research Expose | Think Research Expose Says:

    […] Russia recognizes Pakistan’s prime geopolitical potential and has thus maneuvered to rapidly increase its full-spectrum relations with the South Asian gatekeeper. Russia’s overarching goal, as it is with all of its partners nowadays, is to provide a non-provocative balancing component to buffet Pakistan’s regional political position and assist with its peaceful integration into the multipolar Eurasian framework being constructed by the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. […]

  48. Mega analysis: 2016 Trends Forecast by Andrew Korybko – GPOLIT Says:

    […] in exporting the country’s resources to the energy-deprived island chain. On a grander level, the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership tacitly implies that both sides can cooperate with the other’s rivals (in this case, Russia […]

  49. Pakistan’s "War On Terror" dilemma by Tayyab Baloch - GPOLIT Says:

    […] As he writes, “Perverted in the Western imagination as a backward land of terrorism and poverty, the mainstream media myth about Pakistan carries little factual weight and purposely neglects the country’s rising geopolitical importance in Eurasia. Far from being a lost cause, the country is actually one of the supercontinent’s most important economic hopes, as it has the potential to connect the massive economies of the Eurasian Union, Iran, SAARC, and China, thereby inaugurating the closest thing to an integrated pan-Eurasian economic zone. Russia recognizes Pakistan’s prime geopolitical potential and has thus maneuvered to rapidly increase its full-spectrum relations with the South Asian gatekeeper. Russia’s overarching goal, as it is with all of its partners nowadays, is to provide a non-provocative balancing component to buffet Pakistan’s regional political position and assist with its peaceful integration into the multipolar Eurasian framework being constructed by the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership.” […]

  50. A Caspian Canal? Not So Fast… | Oriental Review Says:

    […] and complicating the traditional and stable dynamic that has been in place there as a result of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. There’s a fine line between multipolar engagement via trade and soft power mechanisms and […]

  51. Hybrid Wars 3. Predicting Next Hybrid Wars- by Andrew Korybko - GPOLIT Says:

    […] sometime in the near future. Elsewhere, however, there’s no direct integrational overlap of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnershipexcept in the Balkans, but even there, the confluence of interests is less tightly connected and […]

  52. Hybrid Wars 6. Trick To Containing China (I) | Oriental Review Says:

    […] of their shared global vision and the framework through which they cooperate in achieving it is the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, and because of Beijing’s intimate closeness with Moscow, it too has been targeted for full-scale […]

  53. Guerres hybrides : 6. Comment contenir la Chine (I) | Réseau International Says:

    […] La manifestation de leur vision globale commune et le cadre dans lequel elles coopèrent est le partenariat stratégique russo-chinois, et à cause de la proximité intime de Pékin avec Moscou, c’est aussi la cible des […]

  54. Guerres hybrides : 3. Prédire les prochaines guerres hybrides | Arrêt sur Info Says:

    […] proche avenir. Par ailleurs, cependant, il n’y a pas de chevauchement direct d’intégration du partenariat stratégique russo-chinois, sauf dans les Balkans, mais même là, la confluence des intérêts est moins étroitement […]

  55. Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? (I) | Oriental Review Says:

    […] than on the real-sector economy. Still, when taken together in the complementary context of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, Moscow and Beijing’s combined interests in Zimbabwe have made it an irresistible target for […]

  56. Color Revolutions? Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? | Counter Information Says:

    […] on the real-sector economy. Still, when taken together in the complementary context of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, Moscow and Beijing’s combined interests in Zimbabwe have made it an irresistible target for […]

  57. Here’s Why The US Wants To Break Bolivia To Bits With Hybrid War - by Andrew Korybko - GPOLIT Says:

    […] we turn, it seems, it looks like Bolivia is more and more becoming the latest joint project of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership in helping to construct a multipolar world, but precisely for that reason, we need to watch out for […]

  58. Here’s Why The US Wants To Break Bolivia To Bits With Hybrid War | NewZSentinel Says:

    […] it seems, it looks like Bolivia is more and more becoming the latest joint project of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership in helping to construct a multipolar world, but precisely for that reason, we need to watch […]

  59. Oriental Review : Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? (I) | documentation.erlande Says:

    […] than on the real-sector economy. Still, when taken together in the complementary context of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, Moscow and Beijing’s combined interests in Zimbabwe have made it an irresistible target for […]

  60. El plan afroeuroasiático para un orden mundial multipolar | Página transversal Says:

    […] hemisférica (y posiblemente mundial), pero sin embargo, todavía quedaría definida por la asociación estratégica ruso-china que mantiene unido su núcleo […]

  61. Hybrid Wars 8. Uganda’s Pivotal Future Could Be Undermined | Oriental Review Says:

    […] some useful background information into Uganda’s relationship with the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership and the balancing act that Museveni is playing between the East and West, the reader is urged to […]

  62. New Strategic Calculus For The Balkans Says:

    […] Central Balkans and their strategic Russian and Chinese partners must publicly articulate their multipolar vision for the region, as such a strong and […]

  63. Guerre Hybride 8. Le pivot à venir de l’Ouganda pourrait être miné 1/2 | Réseau International Says:

    […] obtenir des informations générales utiles sur les relations de l’Ouganda avec le Partenariat stratégique russo-chinois et l’équilibre entre Museveni et l’Est, il est demandé au lecteur de se référer à […]

  64. Hybrid Wars 8. Uganda’s Pivotal Future Could Be Undermined | Réseau International (english) Says:

    […] some useful background information into Uganda’s relationship with the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership and the balancing act that Museveni is playing between the East and West, the reader is urged to […]

  65. Hybrid Wars 8. South Atlantic Africa | Oriental Review Says:

    […] in Angola means that the South Atlantic country is host to a unique interplay of the global Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. This plays out through Moscow assisting with security and energy marketplace cooperation while […]

  66. Hybrid Wars and the Geopolitics of South Atlantic Africa. The Russia-China Strategic Outpost |  SHOAH Says:

    […] in Angola means that the South Atlantic country is host to a unique interplay of the global Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. This plays out through Moscow assisting with security and energy marketplace cooperation while […]

  67. Hybrid Wars and the Geopolitics of South Atlantic Africa. The Russia-China Strategic Outpost | Counter Information Says:

    […] in Angola means that the South Atlantic country is host to a unique interplay of the global Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. This plays out through Moscow assisting with security and energy marketplace cooperation while […]

  68. Hybrid Wars 8. Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up? | Oriental Review Says:

    […] than on the real-sector economy. Still, when taken together in the complementary context of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, Moscow and Beijing’s combined interests in Zimbabwe have made it an irresistible target for […]

  69. Balkan Challenges to the New Detente: Part III - Regional Rapport Says:

    […] In fact, if Serbia can succeed in making itself the object of healthy competition between both strategically partnered Eurasian Great Powers, then there would be plenty of reasons for Serbs to look forward to whatever […]

  70. Hybrid Wars: Is Southern Africa about to Be Shaken Up? | Fake News Registry Says:

    […] on the real-sector economy. Still, when taken together in the complementary context of the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership, Moscow and Beijing’s combined interests in Zimbabwe have made it an irresistible target for […]

  71. The Korean Crisis, the US’ Next Phase of Pan-Eurasian Containment @soynadieorg – Soynadie Photo Press Says:

    […] in order to stem the American-encouraged spread of pan-Eurasian destabilization. Moscow enjoys excellent relations with Beijing, is in a promising rapprochement with Tokyo, and has unrealized by strong […]

  72. The Korean Crisis, the US’ Next Phase of Pan-Eurasian Containment – Houston Communist Party Says:

    […] in order to stem the American-encouraged spread of pan-Eurasian destabilization. Moscow enjoys excellent relations with Beijing, is in a promising rapprochement with Tokyo, and has unrealized by strong […]

  73. Guerre Hybride 8. L’Afrique de l’Atlantique Sud – Angola 1/2 | Réseau International Says:

    […] pays de l’Atlantique Sud accueille un partenariat à double sens, unique dans le cadre global du Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. Cela se joue avec l’aide à la sécurité et à la coopération de Moscou sur le marché de […]

  74. Les guerres hybrides et la géopolitique de l’Afrique de l’Atlantique Sud. L’avant-poste stratégique Russie-Chine. - Afriact.net - Actualité de l'Afrique Says:

    […] pays de l’Atlantique Sud accueille un partenariat à double sens, unique dans le cadre global du Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. Cela se joue avec l’aide à la sécurité et à la coopération de Moscou sur le marché de […]

  75. Nouvelles d'Eurasie : la stratégie des USA pour reprendre la main Says:

    […] faire obstacle au développement des manoeuvres de déstabilisation de la pan-Eurasie. Moscou jouit d’excellentes relations avec Pékin, travaille à un rapprochement prometteur avec Tokyo, et a un fort potentiel […]

  76. Hybrid Wars 8. South Atlantic Africa | Réseau International (english) Says:

    […] in Angola means that the South Atlantic country is host to a unique interplay of the global Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership. This plays out through Moscow assisting with security and energy marketplace cooperation while […]

  77. Guerre Hybride 8. L’Afrique australe est-elle sur le point d’être secouée ? | Réseau International Says:

    […] sont pris ensemble dans le contexte complémentaire du partenariat stratégique entre la Russie et la Chine, les intérêts combinés de Moscou et de Pékin au Zimbabwe en font une cible irrésistible pour […]

Leave a Reply