Washington’s Nightmare Comes True: The Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership Goes Global (I)

The Russian-Chinese strategic partnership (RCSP), indoctrinated in 1996, is Eurasia’s geopolitical anchor in the 21st century, shaping its evolution and entrance into the Multipolar World. No other political relationship between the two continents’ actors even comes close, with the RCSP’s only formidable rival being the US via its privileged military alliances with NATO, the Gulf Kingdoms, and Japan. In this century’s struggle for the supercontinent, the interplay between the RCSP and the US will come to define global politics.

Detractors or Distracters?

Much ado has been made in the Western media about the RCSP, with some highlighting its significance in challenging the Washington Consensus and others brushing it off as nothing more than Moscow’s increasing dependency on Beijing. The views of the former are often trumpeted to scare Americans and justify their government’s aggression against Russia and China, while the latter serves to feed a disinformation campaign meant to split Russia and China apart. Only rarely is the RCSP mentioned as a cautionary warning for the US to moderate its policies, which is the most responsible way to present this development to the Western voter.

The article’s intent is to provocatively argue that the RCSP is already a worldwide reality in the making, the manifestation of Washington’s nightmare, and that it extends beyond Eurasia and even into North Africa and Latin America. It does seek to challenge the Western order, but only to help guide the transition to the Multipolar World, a goal which both countries pledged their solidarity to in 1997. The US’ reluctance in recognizing the tectonic shifts that have occurred in the world since then and its insistence on prolonging the fading unipolar moment are the largest sources of global destabilization today. Despite what the detractors try to achieve by fear mongering and the distracters by divisionary tactics, the RCSP is peaceful, defensive, and more unified than ever. By exploring the confluences of Russian-Chinese policy in key areas of Eurasia and beyond, the article will prove that the RCSP is alive and growing, actively working to steer the world closer to multipolarity.

PART I: Structure

Russia-China talks in Beijing, May 2014.
Russia-China talks in Beijing, May 2014.

Before moving on into the geopolitical details of the RCSP, one needs to identify its structural underpinnings. These are the roles of Russia and China, the basic fundamentals of their cooperation, and their institutional actions in restructuring the international order.

The Russian Balancer and the Chinese Gateway

There are certain segmented roles that both partners play through their interaction with one another. Russia acts as military and political balancer across Eurasia, providing an alternative (be it to the US or China) to all Great Powers, emerging states, and interested entities. It will be shown how Russia works in close conjunction with China to make sure that this balancing act satisfies the strategic objectives of both, sometimes playing a ‘good cop, bad cop’ dynamic. China, for its part, is on track to surpass the US as the world’s largest economy in terms of PPP this year, and it is the predominant economic power in the developing world. Its deep and privileged ties with developing agriculture and commodity markets in Africa, Latin America, and the String of Pearls states makes it a valuable economic gateway for Russia, especially in light of recent developments. Thus, what Russia can provide China in terms of military and political balancing in key global regions, China can reciprocate with economic opportunities and trade facilitation there via its already established contacts and elite networks.

Of course, the power tandem between Russia and China is far from perfect, as is its strategic application across the world, but this is the general theory of their hand-in-glove approach: Russia is the Balancer and China is the Gateway. The further that one moves from these two, for example, to the Mideast and Latin America, the more they can see the pure multipolar objectives and close coordination between these states; likewise, the closer they get to these two Eurasian cores, the more complex the relationship appears and the more difficult it may be to understand.

The Cradle of Cooperation

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is the cradle in which the RCSP was born and raised. Originally founded as the Shanghai Five in 1996, it was reformed as the SCO in 2001 with the inclusion of Uzbekistan. Since then, it has established observer cooperation with Mongolia, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran, as well as dialogue partnerships with Sri Lanka, Turkey, and Belarus. These countries directly fall into the immediate sphere of the RCSP, where either Russia or China can exert some degree or another of important nfluence to varying degrees. Also, the SCO sets out the foundations of the RCSP, listing the fight against “terrorism, separatism, and extremism in all their manifestations” (thus including Color Revolutions) as their foremost foe. It just so happens that the US engages in all of these activities in its Eurasian-wide campaign of chaos and control, thereby placing it at existential odds with Russia and China, as well as the other official members. It should not be forgotten that the SCO regularly holds joint military drills among its members, too.

The BRICS Bastion

In what is the most visible form of the RCSP, the two countries all but cooperate as one force within the BRICS format. In May, Putin stated in regards to China that “We have common priorities both on the global and regional scale…We have agreed to coordinate our foreign policy steps more closely, including within the UN, BRICS and the APEC… We have no disagreements. On the contrary, we have vast plans that we are fully determined to translate into reality.” This groundbreaking declaration of global intent made the indispensible transition to action during the July BRICS Summit in Brazil, during which the five members founded the New Development Bank to directly confront the West’s institutional economic dominance. Important memorandums on multipolar understanding and the creation of a currency reserve pool rounded out the other important outcomes of the event. One can thus see that BRICS has become the institutional bastion of Russian-Chinese coordination all across the world.

Structure Summary

Russia and China have their own distinct roles to play within their power tandem, and they are still refining the interplay between them. The SCO, although being a multilateral framework, essentially functions as a bilateral entity for larger Russian-Chinese cooperation, using Central Asia as a practice ground for future applications elsewhere. Continuing with the institutional cooperation between Russia and China, one can most clearly see this in BRICS, most notably in the latest summit. When analyzed as a unified whole, both countries are combining their individual strengths within the proper institutions in order to pursue the shared goal of multipolarity.

To be continued…

Andrew Korybko is the American political correspondent of Voice of Russia who currently lives and studies in Moscow, exclusively for ORIENTAL REVIEW.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  1. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 3. Predicting Next Hybrid Wars- by Andrew Korybko - GPOLIT

  2. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 6. Trick To Containing China (I) | Oriental Review

  3. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 6. Comment contenir la Chine (I) | Réseau International

  4. Pingback: Guerres hybrides : 3. Prédire les prochaines guerres hybrides | Arrêt sur Info

  5. Pingback: Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? (I) | Oriental Review

  6. Pingback: Color Revolutions? Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? | Counter Information

  7. Pingback: Here’s Why The US Wants To Break Bolivia To Bits With Hybrid War - by Andrew Korybko - GPOLIT

  8. Pingback: Here’s Why The US Wants To Break Bolivia To Bits With Hybrid War | NewZSentinel

  9. Pingback: Oriental Review : Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up By Hybrid War? (I) | documentation.erlande

  10. Pingback: El plan afroeuroasiático para un orden mundial multipolar | Página transversal

  11. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. Uganda’s Pivotal Future Could Be Undermined | Oriental Review

  12. Pingback: New Strategic Calculus For The Balkans

  13. Pingback: Guerre Hybride 8. Le pivot à venir de l’Ouganda pourrait être miné 1/2 | Réseau International

  14. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. Uganda’s Pivotal Future Could Be Undermined | Réseau International (english)

  15. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. South Atlantic Africa | Oriental Review

  16. Pingback: Hybrid Wars and the Geopolitics of South Atlantic Africa. The Russia-China Strategic Outpost |  SHOAH

  17. Pingback: Hybrid Wars and the Geopolitics of South Atlantic Africa. The Russia-China Strategic Outpost | Counter Information

  18. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. Is Southern Africa About To Be Shaken Up? | Oriental Review

  19. Pingback: Balkan Challenges to the New Detente: Part III - Regional Rapport

  20. Pingback: Hybrid Wars: Is Southern Africa about to Be Shaken Up? | Fake News Registry

  21. Pingback: The Korean Crisis, the US’ Next Phase of Pan-Eurasian Containment @soynadieorg – Soynadie Photo Press

  22. Pingback: The Korean Crisis, the US’ Next Phase of Pan-Eurasian Containment – Houston Communist Party

  23. Pingback: Guerre Hybride 8. L’Afrique de l’Atlantique Sud – Angola 1/2 | Réseau International

  24. Pingback: Les guerres hybrides et la géopolitique de l’Afrique de l’Atlantique Sud. L’avant-poste stratégique Russie-Chine. - Afriact.net - Actualité de l'Afrique

  25. Pingback: Nouvelles d'Eurasie : la stratégie des USA pour reprendre la main

  26. Pingback: Hybrid Wars 8. South Atlantic Africa | Réseau International (english)

  27. Pingback: Guerre Hybride 8. L’Afrique australe est-elle sur le point d’être secouée ? | Réseau International

  28. Pingback: America’s Guide To Dismantling The Multipolar World – OrientalReview.org

  29. Pingback: Kudashev Is No Kadakin, But That's A Good Thing | CommandEleven

  30. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? | OrientalReview.org

  31. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? – Earths Final Countdown

  32. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? – Tradebuddy.online Stockmarket news – Forex – News – Realtime market Data- World News – Trading Ideas

  33. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? | ProTradingResearch

  34. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia's Grand Strategy Shifting? - Political American

  35. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? – The Conservative Insider

  36. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia's Grand Strategy Shifting? | WarMachines.com

  37. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia’s Grand Strategy Shifting? | Wall Street Karma

  38. Pingback: Today’s News 7th October 2017 | The One Hundredth Monkey

  39. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia's Grand Strategy Shifting? | Golden Gate Daily

  40. Pingback: Is Saudi Arabia's Grand Strategy Shifting? - The Falling Darkness

  41. Pingback: ¿La gran estrategia de Arabia Saudita está cambiando? – Información Alternativa, Geopolitica, Revisionismo…

  42. Pingback: CIAs blunder i SaudiArabien: USA har förlorat sin Arabiska vän | Filosofens blogg

  43. Pingback: Does USA still hold the "only superpower" title? - TACSTRAT

  44. Pingback: Why Does Russia Want To Sell Arms To The Central African Republic? | OrientalReview.org

  45. Pingback: Pourquoi la Russie veut-elle vendre des armes à la République Centrafricaine? | Réseau International

  46. Pingback: Why Does Russia Want to Sell Arms to the Central African Republic? – Counter Information

  47. Pingback: Why Does Russia Want to Sell Arms to the Central African Republic? | Tegenwicht Platform

  48. Pingback: Pence’s Anti-Pakistani Declaration Could Unite The “Golden Circle” | OrientalReview.org

  49. Pingback: Will Washington's Veiled NSS Threats against Pakistan Contribute to Consolidating Its Economic Alignment with China … | Donald J. Trump No. 45

  50. Pingback: Trump: Agent Of Chaos? | Real Patriot News

Leave a Reply