Russia’s Foreign Policy Progressives Have Trumped The Traditionalists

Russia’s foreign policy “rebalancing” is the result of its progressive “deep state” faction obtaining more influence than the traditionalist one in deciding grand strategy.

Many observers of Russian foreign policy have been left confused over the past couple of years as Moscow’s deft geostrategic maneuverings in the “Ummah” caught them completely off guard, as they never expected for Russia’s “Pivot/Rebalancing to Asia” to take on Muslim proportions in South-Central Eurasia. Most of these same people have difficulty accepting Russia’s moves, and instead have sought to either ignore, downplay, or craft outlandish conspiracy theories about them. The partnerships drawing the most controversy are those which Russia has recently reached with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan, and the reason why they’ve created such a fuss is because they fly straight in the face of everything that the foreign policy “traditionalists” stand for.

The “progressive” faction of the Russian “deep state” (permanent military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies) understands that their country needs to flexibly adapt to the full-spectrum paradigm changes taking place across the globe as the emerging Multipolar World Order progressively enters into force. This means reconceptualizing Russia’s 21st-century geostrategic role and perceiving it as striving to become the supreme balancing force in the Eurasian supercontinent, which necessitates reaching mutually advantageous arrangements with non-traditional partners. The traditionalists, however, believe that Russia shouldn’t ever diversify from its existing partners in any way that could even remotely upset them, which symbolizes their extremely dogmatic and unflinching approach to the issue.

These traditionalists think that Russia either isn’t serious about its newfound partnerships or is engaging in them out of desperation to “keep one’s enemies close”, refusing to acknowledge that Moscow is actually very committed to deepening relations with each of its new partners and has sincere intentions to enter into multiple trust-building initiatives with them. For example, it’s ridiculous to suggest that Russia’s S-400 (military), Turkish/Balkan Stream (energy), and Astana (diplomatic) ties with Turkey are anything but genuine and designed to bring the two sides closer than at any moment in their histories. The same goes for its OPEC, investment, and potential arms ties with Saudi Arabia; its all-around strengthened partnership with Azerbaijan; and its rapid rapprochement with Pakistan.

All of these moves have shocked the traditionalists, who are fearful that their country has “betrayed” its beloved Syrian, Iranian, Armenian, and Indian partners due to the “irresponsible” forays of the progressives, but that’s not true at all since it was in reality the latter two states which “betrayed” Russia, as the author explained in his recent article questioning whether “Armenia, India, And Serbia Are ‘Balancing’ Against Russia Or ‘Betraying’ It?”. Even in this case, however, Russia still isn’t “betraying” anybody, since it’s simply diversifying and updating its international relationships for in line with the 21st-century geopolitics of the New Cold War in order to better “balance” the affairs of the Eurasian supercontinent, which is also the reason why it’s moved so close to Turkey and Saudi Arabia too in spite of the inferred uncomfortableness that this might make some in Syria and Iran feel.

Given the astounding geostrategic progress that Russia has made in the past couple of years in turning itself into a real force to be reckoned with in the Ummah, it’s extraordinarily unlikely and actually all but impossible that it will backtrack on its latest gains and revert back to the outdated mode of thinking that the traditionalists want it to abide by. The progressives “run the roost”, so to speak, and they’ve made it abundantly clear on numerous occasions that none of these exciting new partnerships are to the “zero-sum” disadvantage of anyone else; rather, they epitomize the “win-win” logic that modern-day multipolarity is becoming known for, whether observers recognize it right now or sometime later on.

If Russia is successful in retaining its “legacy” partnerships while strengthening the new ones that it’s worked hard to acquire, then the traditionalist-progressive “deep state” dichotomy might give way to a single class of “balancers/managers” in the future as Moscow finally fulfills its envisioned 21st-century geostrategic role in Eurasia.

Russian FM Sergey Lavrov greeting his Saudi counterpart in Moscow, June 2016
Russian FM Sergey Lavrov greeting his Saudi counterpart in Moscow, June 2016

DISCLAIMER: The author writes for this publication in a private capacity which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for his own personal views. Nothing written by the author should ever be conflated with the editorial views or official positions of any other media outlet or institution. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
245 Comments
  1. Pingback: Now's the Chance to Clinch a Russia-Pakistan Military Partnership  | CommandEleven

  2. Pingback: Russia Might "Pivot To Africa" With "Mercenaries" | StockTalk Journal

  3. Pingback: Russia Might “Pivot To Africa” With “Mercenaries” – The Conservative Insider

  4. Pingback: The US’ Boast that NK Sanctions are Meant to Kill Puts RF and PRC on the Spot - Regional Rapport

  5. Pingback: Will American Missiles Destroy The Russian-Japanese Rapprochement? | OrientalReview.org

  6. Pingback: Russia Might “Pivot To Africa” With “Mercenaries” | Isenberg Institute of Strategic Satire

  7. Pingback: Is It Even Possible To “Betray” The Kurds? | OrientalReview.org

  8. Pingback: Dangerous Delusions: Syria Isn’t Going to Liberate Palestine Anytime Soon nor Is Russia Turning Against “Israel” – Counter Information

  9. Pingback: Netanyahu’s “Operation Greater Israel”? Israel’s Intent to Wage War on Lebanon. – aladdinsmiraclelamp

  10. Pingback: Dangerous Delusions: Syria Isn’t Going to Liberate Palestine Anytime Soon nor Is Russia Turning Against “Israel” |  SHOAH

  11. Pingback: The Kurds Have Backed Damascus Into A Corner | OrientalReview.org

  12. Pingback: The Kurds Have Backed Damascus into a Corner - The 5 Towns Jewish Times

  13. Pingback: Saudi Arabia Might Recognize Israel Because Of NEOM - The 5 Towns Jewish Times

  14. Pingback: Trump And Assad Are On The Same Side In Afrin | OrientalReview.org

  15. Pingback: Russia’s Hypersonic Missiles Didn’t Surprise America But They Awed The World – iftttwall

  16. Pingback: Russia’s Hypersonic Missiles Didn’t Surprise America But They Awed The World – The Deplorable Patriots

  17. Pingback: Russia's Hypersonic Missiles Didn't Surprise America But They Awed The World - Alternative Report

  18. Pingback: Vers où va-t-on ?:Le sort des Empires et la recherche de leur survie 3/5 | actualitserlande

  19. Pingback: Trump et Assad sont du même côté à Afrine - AncienProfesseur

  20. Pingback: Trump And Assad Are On The Same Side In Afrin | Réseau International (english)

  21. Pingback: Trump et Assad sont du même côté à Afrine | Réseau International

  22. Pingback: Trump et Assad sont-ils du même côté à Afrine? – Salimsellami's Blog

  23. Pingback: Russia’s S-400s Are The Key To A Neo-NAM | OrientalReview.org

  24. Pingback: La integración de Irán a la Unión Euroasiática sería un impulso de las relaciones Irán-Pakistán | RRTS MAGAZINE

  25. Pingback: 21st-Century Paradigm Shift In Eurasia: Towards A New Trilateral | OrientalReview.org

  26. Pingback: What The US Really Wants From Russia – Webstynx

  27. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? - Sell The News

  28. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | Real Patriot News

  29. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | Investing Daily News

  30. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | CENSORED.TODAY

  31. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | StockTalk Journal

  32. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? – TradingCheatSheet

  33. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? – Wall Street Karma

  34. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | NUTesla | The Informant

  35. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? – ProTradingResearch

  36. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network

  37. Pingback: Is This What The US Really Wants From Russia? | Wall Street Vibes

  38. Pingback: Rus-Pak Military Relations Are On The Path To Strategic Partnership | OrientalReview.org

  39. Pingback: The Strategic Implications Of A Possible Russian Base In Somaliland | Saxafi Media

  40. Pingback: The Strategic Implications Of A Possible Russian Base In Somaliland | Qaran News

  41. Pingback: Somaliland News 24

  42. Pingback: Russia’s “Pivot to Africa”? The Strategic Implications of a Achievable Russian Base in Somaliland – Viralmount

  43. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – Earths Final Countdown

  44. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – The Deplorable Patriots

  45. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War - Novus Vero

  46. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War | StockTalk Journal

  47. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – ProTradingResearch

  48. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War | Investing Daily News

  49. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War - tradebuddy.online Financial News. Trade the markets Now!

  50. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War | Real Patriot News

Leave a Reply