Russia’s Foreign Policy Progressives Have Trumped The Traditionalists

Russia’s foreign policy “rebalancing” is the result of its progressive “deep state” faction obtaining more influence than the traditionalist one in deciding grand strategy.

Many observers of Russian foreign policy have been left confused over the past couple of years as Moscow’s deft geostrategic maneuverings in the “Ummah” caught them completely off guard, as they never expected for Russia’s “Pivot/Rebalancing to Asia” to take on Muslim proportions in South-Central Eurasia. Most of these same people have difficulty accepting Russia’s moves, and instead have sought to either ignore, downplay, or craft outlandish conspiracy theories about them. The partnerships drawing the most controversy are those which Russia has recently reached with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan, and the reason why they’ve created such a fuss is because they fly straight in the face of everything that the foreign policy “traditionalists” stand for.

The “progressive” faction of the Russian “deep state” (permanent military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies) understands that their country needs to flexibly adapt to the full-spectrum paradigm changes taking place across the globe as the emerging Multipolar World Order progressively enters into force. This means reconceptualizing Russia’s 21st-century geostrategic role and perceiving it as striving to become the supreme balancing force in the Eurasian supercontinent, which necessitates reaching mutually advantageous arrangements with non-traditional partners. The traditionalists, however, believe that Russia shouldn’t ever diversify from its existing partners in any way that could even remotely upset them, which symbolizes their extremely dogmatic and unflinching approach to the issue.

These traditionalists think that Russia either isn’t serious about its newfound partnerships or is engaging in them out of desperation to “keep one’s enemies close”, refusing to acknowledge that Moscow is actually very committed to deepening relations with each of its new partners and has sincere intentions to enter into multiple trust-building initiatives with them. For example, it’s ridiculous to suggest that Russia’s S-400 (military), Turkish/Balkan Stream (energy), and Astana (diplomatic) ties with Turkey are anything but genuine and designed to bring the two sides closer than at any moment in their histories. The same goes for its OPEC, investment, and potential arms ties with Saudi Arabia; its all-around strengthened partnership with Azerbaijan; and its rapid rapprochement with Pakistan.

All of these moves have shocked the traditionalists, who are fearful that their country has “betrayed” its beloved Syrian, Iranian, Armenian, and Indian partners due to the “irresponsible” forays of the progressives, but that’s not true at all since it was in reality the latter two states which “betrayed” Russia, as the author explained in his recent article questioning whether “Armenia, India, And Serbia Are ‘Balancing’ Against Russia Or ‘Betraying’ It?”. Even in this case, however, Russia still isn’t “betraying” anybody, since it’s simply diversifying and updating its international relationships for in line with the 21st-century geopolitics of the New Cold War in order to better “balance” the affairs of the Eurasian supercontinent, which is also the reason why it’s moved so close to Turkey and Saudi Arabia too in spite of the inferred uncomfortableness that this might make some in Syria and Iran feel.

Given the astounding geostrategic progress that Russia has made in the past couple of years in turning itself into a real force to be reckoned with in the Ummah, it’s extraordinarily unlikely and actually all but impossible that it will backtrack on its latest gains and revert back to the outdated mode of thinking that the traditionalists want it to abide by. The progressives “run the roost”, so to speak, and they’ve made it abundantly clear on numerous occasions that none of these exciting new partnerships are to the “zero-sum” disadvantage of anyone else; rather, they epitomize the “win-win” logic that modern-day multipolarity is becoming known for, whether observers recognize it right now or sometime later on.

If Russia is successful in retaining its “legacy” partnerships while strengthening the new ones that it’s worked hard to acquire, then the traditionalist-progressive “deep state” dichotomy might give way to a single class of “balancers/managers” in the future as Moscow finally fulfills its envisioned 21st-century geostrategic role in Eurasia.

Russian FM Sergey Lavrov greeting his Saudi counterpart in Moscow, June 2016
Russian FM Sergey Lavrov greeting his Saudi counterpart in Moscow, June 2016

DISCLAIMER: The author writes for this publication in a private capacity which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for his own personal views. Nothing written by the author should ever be conflated with the editorial views or official positions of any other media outlet or institution. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
245 Comments
  1. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War - truthtavern.com

  2. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – TradingCheatSheet

  3. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – Wall Street Karma

  4. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War | Wall Street Vibes

  5. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War | Raw Conservative Opinions

  6. Pingback: The True Origins Of The US-Chinese Trade War – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network

  7. Pingback: OPCW vote & South Asia: Why Pakistan backed Russia but India abstained - Global Village Space

  8. Pingback: Vers où va-t-on ?:C’est pas la joie chez Cars | actualitserlande

  9. Pingback: Les S-400 russes sont la clé d’un nouveau mouvement des non-alignés | Réseau International

  10. Pingback: Les S-400 russes sont la clé d’un nouveau mouvement des non-alignés - AncienProfesseur

  11. Pingback: Everything You Need To Know About “eSwatini” – Nyhetspalatset

  12. Pingback: What “Moral Obligation” Did Russia Have to Not Provide S-300s to Syria? Moscow-Tel Aviv’s Unspoken Romantic relationship – Viralmount

  13. Pingback: The Resumption of Russian-“Israeli” Free of charge Trade Talks Proves “Ties Are Fantastic”. Implications for Syria? – Viralmount

  14. Pingback: Vers où va-t-on ?:Le premier trimestre 2018 a été un désastre pour l’Amérique ;Macron pourrait piéger la France dans un bourbier au nord de la Syrie comme au Mali; Les vraies origines de la guerre commerciale américano-chinoise | actualitserlande

  15. Pingback: The Resumption of Russia-Israel Free Trade Talks Proves “Ties Are Fantastic”. Implications for Syria? | | truthaholics

  16. Pingback: Les implications stratégiques d’une éventuelle base russe au Somaliland | Réseau International

  17. Pingback: The Strategic Implications Of A Possible Russian Base In Somaliland | Réseau International (english)

  18. Pingback: Les vraies origines de la guerre commerciale américano-chinoise – RESEAU ACTU

  19. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America - Novus Vero

  20. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America - truthtavern.com

  21. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America – The Deplorable Patriots

  22. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America | Newzsentinel

  23. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America | StockTalk Journal

  24. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America | Real Patriot News

  25. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America – Conspiracy News

  26. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America – top10brokersbinaryoptions.com

  27. Pingback: Maïdan reloaded : changement de régime en Arménie

  28. Pingback: What’s The Meaning Of Morocco Cutting Off Ties With Iran? | OrientalReview.org

  29. Pingback: What’s The Meaning Of Morocco Cutting Off Ties With Iran? – Nyhetspalatset

  30. Pingback: Armenian Anarchy Is Only Good For America – Nyhetspalatset

  31. Pingback: Only Russia Can De-Escalate The Proxy War Between The West And Iran In Syria | OrientalReview.org

  32. Pingback: Only Russia Can De-Escalate The Proxy War Between The West And Iran In Syria – Nyhetspalatset

  33. Pingback: The “Arab NATO” to Make Syria’s “Internal Partition” a Reality |  SHOAH

  34. Pingback: Only Russia Can De-Escalate the Proxy War Amongst the West and Iran in Syria – Viralmount

  35. Pingback: Only Russia Can De-Escalate the Proxy War Between the West and Iran in Syria – Counter Information

  36. Pingback: Russia's Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong) - Novus Vero

  37. Pingback: Russia's Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong) - Free Money Cash Ways

  38. Pingback: Russia's Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong) - truthtavern.com

  39. Pingback: Russia’s Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong) | peoples trust toronto

  40. Pingback: Russia's Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong) – TradingCheatSheet

  41. Pingback: Russia’s Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia – SPLIT INSTITUTE

  42. Pingback: President Putin On Israel: Quotes From The Kremlin Website | OrientalReview.org

  43. Pingback: Russia’s Hypersonic Missiles Didn’t Surprise America But They Awed The World | OrientalReview.org

  44. Pingback: President Putin On Israel: Quotes From The Kremlin Website – Webstynx

  45. Pingback: Why Cry? It is Good News that Trump Pulled Out of the Iran Offer! – Viralmount

  46. Pingback: Why Cry? It’s Great News that Trump Pulled Out of the Iran Deal! – Counter Information

  47. Pingback: Victory Day 2018 Forever Changed How Alt-Media Views Russia And Israel – Webstynx

  48. Pingback: Why Cry? It’s Great News that Trump Pulled Out of the Iran Deal! |  SHOAH

  49. Pingback: Russia’s Unspoken Relationship with Israel – Viralmount

  50. Pingback: Russia’s Unspoken Relationship with Israel – Counter Information

Leave a Reply