Raqqa Destroyed To Liberate It

2017 Raqqa Offensive

The so-called Islamic State organization was primarily a bogeyman encouraged by the western powers. I’ve been saying this for the last four years.

I asserted, as a former soldier and war correspondent, that IS would collapse like a wet paper bag if proper western ground forces attacked their strongholds in Syria and Iraq. This week, the western powers and their local satraps finally took action and stormed the last IS stronghold at Raqqa. To no surprise, IS put up almost no resistance and ran for its miserable life.

The much-dreaded IS was never more than a bunch of young hooligans and religious fanatics who were as militarily effective as the medieval Children’s Crusade.

In the West, IS was blown up by media and governments into a giant monster that was coming to cut the throats of honest folk in the suburbs.

IS did stage some very bloody and grisly attacks – that’s what put it on the map. But none of them posed any mortal threat or really endangered our national security. In fact, the primary target of IS attacks has been Shia Muslims in the Mideast.

Many of the IS attacks in North America and Europe were done by mentally deranged individuals or were initiated by under-cover government provocateurs, such as the 1993 bombing of New York’s World Trade Center. IS was notorious for falsely taking credit for attacks it did not commit.

Other ‘lone wolf’ attacks were made by Mideasterners driven to revenge after watching the destruction by the US and its allies of substantial parts of their region. Think Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Afghanistan, parts of Pakistan, and the murderous brutality of Egypt’s-US backed regime.

IS appears to have been shaped by western intelligence in an effort to duplicate its success with the Afghan mujahidin in the mid 1980’s that helped defeat the Soviet Union. CIA, Pakistani and Saudi intelligence, and Britain’s MI-6 recruited some 100,000 volunteers from across the Muslim world to wage jihad in Afghanistan. I observed this brilliant success first hand from the ranks of the mujahidin.

The western powers, led by the US, sought to emulate this success in Syria by unleashing armies of mercenaries, disaffected, unemployed youth, and religious primitives against the independent-minded regime of President Bashar Assad. The plan nearly worked – at least until Russia, Iran, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement intervened and reversed the tide of battle.

The canard promoted in the west that IS was a dire military threat was always a big joke. I said so on one TV program and was promptly banned from the station. I’m also the miscreant who insisted that Iraq never had weapons of mass destruction and was consequently blacklisted by a major cable TV news network.

The CIA cobbled together two small armies, one of Kurdish Peshmerga fighters, and the other of Iraqi mercenaries. Both were directed, armed, equipped and financed by Washington. Shades of the British Empire’s native troops under white officers. The Kurds and Iraqi Arabs are now in a major confrontation over the Kirkuk oil-rich region.

Raqqa and Mosul were so close to western forces that they were merely a taxi ride away. But it took three years and much token bombing of the desert before a decisive move was made against IS.

Once the US-led campaign against Damascus failed, the crazies of IS were no longer of any use so they were marked for death.

Like Fallujah in Iraq and Mosul, Raqqa was flattened by US air power, a stark message to those who would defy the American Raj. The ruins of Raqqa, the IS capital, were occupied by US-led forces. This historic déjà vu recalled the dramatic defeat by British Imperial forces at Omdurman in September 1898 of Sudan’s Khalifa and his Islamic dervish army.

The remnants of IS had melted into the Euphrates Valley and the desert. They will now return to being an irksome guerilla group with very little combat power. Anti-western IS supporters still cluster in Europe’s urban ghettos and will cause occasional mayhem. A few high-profile attacks on civilians may be expected to show that IS is still alive. But none of this is likely to influence the course of events. IS’s rival, al-Qaida, is likely to resurface and lead attacks to drive the west out of the Mideast.

The Islamic State bogeyman was very useful for the western powers. It justified deeper military involvement in the Mideast, higher arms budgets, scared people into voting for rightwing parties, and gave police more powers. By contrast, these faux Muslims brought misery, fear and shame on the Islamic world. We are very well rid of them. And it’s about time.

Naim Square roundabout following the liberation of Raqqa, Syria, Oct. 18
Naim Square roundabout following the liberation of Raqqa, Syria, Oct. 18, 2017

Source: the author’s blog

One Comment

  1. Patrick Ludwig

    I agree that Daesh is no more than a gang of mercenaries, set up to a similar pattern as the Afghan Mujaheddin were. But remember, the latter evolved into the Taliban movement. It too is bent on attacking predominantly Shia targets – just like Daesh.

    I see both and most other islamterroristic groups as waging a concerted war against the Shia, a category of Islam that is far more open to modernisation than Sunnism ever will be.
    I consider the Shia a natural future ally to the ideals of the age of enlightenment predominant in Europe and Iran a natural ally of Israel – de facto a European culture.
    It is – in fact by definition – the only reformable Islam. Why this is so is a topic for future discussion.

    I also see the current conflicts in the Sunnite world as very effective in destabilising western Europe by demographic warfare. The conflicts have released mass movements of unstable and culturally unadapted hordes of pseudo-refugees to Europe. These will easily be deployed as agents to destroy an independent and confident Europe in the future. 2nd generation migrants will complete this process effectively.

    So the question is:

    Who has an interest in destabilising western Europe as a confident and strong union of nations, bound together by similar values and a common past?
    A union naturally, culturally and geographically tied to Russia and Asia?
    A Union that could be an important part of a future united EURASIAN continent?

    And here we agree again, the only party with vested interests in such desabilisation is AMEROPA, the US/NATO led group of nations, including Australia, Canada, Britain and the US.

    These countries have long since said farewell to teaditional European values and replaced their culture by an Anglocentric system of pane et circences and lacking any real values or real education.

Leave a Reply