The American Cyber Stasi Will Suppress All Digital Dissent In Biden’s Dystopia

CNN’s recent report that the US’ security services are considering contracting the services of so-called “researchers” as a legal workaround for spying on average Americans confirms that Biden’s dystopian hellhole is rapidly moving in the direction of establishing a “Cyber Stasi” for suppressing all digital dissent against the Democrats as they continuing consolidating their de facto one-party rule of the country.

The dystopian hellhole that I predicted would become a fait accompli following Biden’s confirmation as President by the Electoral College is quickly becoming a reality after CNN’s recent report that the US’ security services are considering contracting the services of so-called “researchers” as a legal workaround for spying on average Americans. According to the outlet, these ostensibly independent contractors would be charged with infiltrating the social media circles of white supremacists and other supposedly terrorist-inclined domestic forces within the country. The report claims that the intent is to “help provide a broad picture of who was perpetuating the ‘narratives’ of concern”, after which “the FBI could theoretically use that pool of information to focus on specific individuals if there is enough evidence of a potential crime to legally do so”.

In other words, the US’ security services essentially want to establish a “Cyber Stasi” of “fellow” citizens who spy on one another and produce purported “evidence” of “potential crimes” for “justifying” the FBI’s “legal” investigations. CNN quoted an unnamed senior intelligence official who asked, “What do you do about ideology that’s leading to violence? Do you have to wait until it leads to violence?”, thereby hinting that this initiative might likely be exploited to stop so-called “pre-crime”, or crimes before they occur. Put another way, even those average Americans who practice their constitutionally enshrined right to the freedom of speech to peacefully dissent against the Democrats’ consolidation of their de facto one-party rule of the country might find themselves targeted by the security services depending on how the contracted “researchers” spin their words.

Biden cyber stasiIt should be remembered that even Americans’ constitutionally enshrined right to the freedom of assembly is nowadays under scrutiny depending on the stated reason behind their planned peaceful protests if they dare to propose gathering in opposition to last year’s alleged voter fraud for example. The events of 6 January were exploited as a game-changer by the security services in order to restrict Americans’ freedoms. It’s neither here nor there whether one sincerely believes that the election was stolen since the purpose in pointing these double standards out is to prove that average Americans are being politically discriminated against with the implied threat of legal intimidation when it comes to exercising their constitutional rights about “politically incorrect” issues of concern to them.

Although the reported purpose of the “Cyber Stasi” is to preemptively thwart emerging domestic terrorist plots, it can’t be discounted that the combination of political Russophobia and “mission creep” will combine to create additional objectives such as stopping the spread of so-called “Russian disinformation” throughout society. That phrase is actually just a euphemism for “politically incorrect” facts and interpretations thereof that contradict the Democrats’ official narrative of events, being intentionally vague enough to function as an umbrella under which to cover practically every alternative understanding possible. With this in mind, those average Americans who dare to share something “politically incorrect” – even in private chats amidst the presence of “deep state” infiltrators (“researchers” employed as “Cyber Stasi”) – might be targeted by the FBI.

The end effect is that the US’ security services might succeed in suppressing most expressions of digital dissent in the coming future. They’re inspired to do so by the ruling administration which wants to impose a syncretic system of economic leftism and social fascism onto the country. It’s not “communist” in the sense that the economic vision is more akin to state capitalism than traditional Marxism, but the social impact will certainly mirror that of East Germany during its darkest days of Stasi rule, though that’s precisely why many critics casually describe it as “communist” despite that not being economically correct (at least not yet). The US’ “researcher”-contracted “Cyber Stasi” will have a chilling effect how Americans interact with one another from here on out, all in order for Biden’s dystopian hellhole to avoid the fate of its predecessor, East Germany.

Source: One World

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  1. Facebook wouldn’t allow me to post a link to this excellent article. Of course this provides yet another piece of evidence substantiating what the article asserts. In this case, censorship is outsourced to Facebook. So I copied/pasted and posted in my timeline. In MeWe, I’m allowed to post the link.

  2. Patrick Ludwig

    The only way to counter the US Gestapo would be to offer attractive alternatives to “faecesbook” and their ilk.

    The USofA completely dominates the social media market and thereby dictates the world’s opinion.

    If Russia, China and other independents would put similar effort, time and money into such offerings – including heavy marketing – we could soon break the the US stranglehold.

    Equally, massive funds and effort should be put into propaganda. The focus should be the same as the focus of the USofA: the English Language and it’s use in influencing public opinion and consciousness.

    This strategy has been employed by the Anglosphere ever since WWll . It’s first success was the hijacking the credit of “Victory” in the said war from the true victors.

    Control the language and you will control the masses.
    Key concepts:

    – Redefine the meaning of words. Examples are “political correctness”, “gender adapted language”.
    – Censor language itself.

    – Emphasize “morality” in the use of words, thus diverting from “meaning”

    – Take control of rational discourse by putting the “new morality” to use. Direct any discussion to the “ethics” track.

    – Introduce and anchor a “victim – oppressor” narrative into all science.

    – Classify everything into “good” or “bad” – irrespective of functionality or objectivity.

    – emphasize “freedom of speech” but at the same time educate people to disregard any content in favour of judgement!

    What good is free speech if nobody listens?

  3. Laika Lammerink

    “East Germany during its darkest days of Stasi rule.” That’s typical Nazi propaganda. As someone from East Germany, I can assure you that’s pretty much the opposite of the truth. (Western, i.e. Nazi propaganda is always the opposite of the truth)

    East Germany’s Stasi and East Germany’s NVA’s job was to protect a (bright) free and democratic East Germany from Western, i.e. Nazi evil. (East Germany was one of the most decent countries in the world at the time)

    Besides, what most Westerners don’t know (!) is that in 1953 Trotskyite, anti-Communist “NWO” agents took over the leadership of the Soviet Union. [the 1953 “NWO” coups against Stalin & Beria, and Mosaddegh] East Germany was under attack from all sides and from within. Learn more about East Germany at

Leave a Reply