The time of Macedonization of Macedonia by the creation of Macedonian regional feelings, which after the WWII became transformed into the ethnonational consciousness, was also the time of the struggle over Macedonia between Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.
There were many variations of the project of the unification of the South Slavic or Yugoslav lands towards the end of the 19th century. However, in all of such projects of a Greater Yugoslavia, Serbia was seen as a Yugoslav Piedmont with Belgrade as the “Serbian Bismarckism”.
In the modern history of the Balkans as a result of the national liberation movements and national liberation wars, important changes took place in the life of the Vlachs since the free migration across the peninsula was impossible because of the new state borders and cross-border restrictions.
The territory of geographical-historical Macedonia has been for the last 150 years one of the focal apples of discord in South-East Europe. A stable prosperous country of Macedonia, however, can serve in the future as a bridge between all of her four neighbors under one condition: to relinquish its territorial irredentism.
Tsarist Russia was sincerely trying all the time to reconcile Slavic nations in conflict, especially those of the Christian Orthodox faith for the sake of Pan-Slavic ideals of intra-Slavic solidarity, reciprocity, and brotherhood.
The roots of Albanian territorial megalomania that is formulated within the framework of a „united“ Greater Albania are dating back in 1878 as a consequence of the results of the Great Eastern Crisis. All projects of a Greater Albania have been anti-Christian Orthodox and primarily anti-Russian.
(Please reference the entire Law of Hybrid War series in order to get acquainted with the strategic themes of this article) Reconceptualizing The Balkan Peninsula The Balkans are the most geostrategically important region in Europe today, and truth be told, they’ve held this role for centuries before, despite whether or […]
(Please read Part I prior to this article) The Bloc In Action General Characteristics: The central dynamic underpinning the Black Sea Bloc is one of irredentist expansionism and strategic branching, which by its very nature mandates that the group is constantly attempting to export its influence past its understood boundaries. […]
The reaction to the cancellation of the South Stream project has been a wonder to behold and needs to be explained very carefully. In order to understand what has happened it is first necessary to go back to the way Russian-European relations were developing in the 1990s. Briefly, at that […]
On the 17th of October EU summit is to take place — primary issue on the agenda of the day is the extension of Schengen zone to the EU freshmen of Bulgaria and Romania. Yet, the latest events have endangered the Schengen extension. Holland and Finland object to that, while […]
The Highest Degree Of Certainty: The New Evidence In The Downing Of Flight MH17 (6,417)
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations (5,988)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (3,852)
NATO’s Manipulation Of The Macedonian Vote Exposes Its Modus Operandi (2,768)
The Unpleasant Truth About The 1941 Parachuting Of Rudolf Hess In England (I) (2,367)
An ISIS fighter: ‘I was forbidden at the Gates of Heaven…’ (162,096)
A New Twist in the Investigation into Flight MH17 (38,464)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (37,291)
Pakistan’s Asymmetrical Response To Trump Is A Clever Way To Flip The Tables On Afghanistan (27,808)
What The Guardian Is Afraid Of When Attacking Honest Syria Reporters? (26,518)
Andrew KORYBKO 
Vladislav SOTIROVIC 
Nikolay STARIKOV 
Vladimir KOZIN 
Gulam ASGAR MITHA 
Eric MARGOLIS 
M. K. BHADRAKUMAR 
Fr. Lawrence FARLEY 
Thierry MEYSSAN 
Fr. Stephen FREEMAN 
Michael AVERKO 
Peter CHAMBERLIN 
Fr. Andrey TKACHEV 
Nauman SADIQ 
Iqbal ALIMOHAMED 
Adam GARRIE 
Sophie MANGAL 
Leonid SAVIN 
Oliver RICHARDSON 
Nafeez AHMED
Comments