The ORF’s public meeting with the Heritage Foundation was a success for India because its most famous academic-expert representatives convincingly virtue signaled to the powerful neoconservative deep state faction that their country is aware of China’s purportedly pernicious intentions in “pushing for the soul of Europe”.
The US is anticipating that the end result of any sustainable pressure campaign against the authorities will be Zambia’s geostrategic “rebalancing” towards the Indo-Japanese “Asia-Africa Growth Corridor” in order to offset its supposed “dependency” on China’s New Silk Road.
Bolivia’s international liberal plea for sovereign access to the Pacific is interestingly a realist ploy for domestic political purposes that will have profound geostrategic consequences in the New Cold War.
Two most significant metanarratives influencing events all across Africa are the US’ War on Terror and China’s One Belt One Road global vision of New Silk Road connectivity.
Iran and Turkey may not be formal allies, but represent something more realistic and therefore more meaningful: they are new partners in a new Middle East and a new Eurasia.
Donald Trump could have created a kind of Trans-American Belt and Road with US Characteristics for a New Era. Instead, Trump has opted to Make America Lose Again.
There is no state besides Russia that’s capable of managing the growing competition between these two Asian Great Powers.
The proposed approach is mostly applicable to the third-party role that Russia could play in Pakistan, whereby the cordial competition with China would give Islamabad more options than it has at present.
China would ideally like for India to join its One Belt One Road (OBOR) global vision of New Silk Road connectivity.
One of the driving motivations behind China’s One Belt One Road global vision of New Silk Road connectivity is to stave off socio-economic challenges caused by the country’s overproduction crisis.
The late Uzbekistani President was ill-equipped for adapting to the New Silk Road Century that China is pioneering through its One Belt One Road vision.
So long as China can succeed in preserving the EU’s consumer market strength, Beijing won’t have much to worry about its long-term strategy for Eurasia.
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations
The Guide To Real History
Mass Killings Of Serbs For Organs Didn’t Start In Kosovo
Connecting The Dots Between Hitler And Global Warming
The Illyrians: Autochthonous Balkan People having Nothing Common with Modern Albanians
An ISIS fighter: ‘I was forbidden at the Gates of Heaven…’ (164,905)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (47,147)
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations (43,389)
A New Twist in the Investigation into Flight MH17 (39,543)
Pakistan’s Asymmetrical Response To Trump Is A Clever Way To Flip The Tables On Afghanistan (28,653)
Andrew KORYBKO 
Vladislav SOTIROVIC 
Binoy KAMPMARK 
Thierry MEYSSAN 
Eric MARGOLIS 
Nikolay STARIKOV 
Vladimir KOZIN 
Fr. Stephen FREEMAN 
Fr. Lawrence FARLEY 
Gulam ASGAR MITHA 
Leonid SAVIN 
Michael AVERKO 
Nafeez AHMED 
Matthew EHRET 
Iqbal ALIMOHAMED 
Peter CHAMBERLIN 
Fr. Andrey TKACHEV 
Rick STERLING 
Nauman SADIQ 
Adam GARRIE
Comments