Rosneft’s controversial move indirectly introduced Russia to the simmering South China Sea dispute, but this might be a good thing because Moscow is known to favor international law and negotiations to any dispute instead of push its partners towards waging war in order to settle problems like the US-led Quad is prone to do.
Providing the Hybrid War-victimized population with a full belly and reliable access to basic commodities might be all that’s needed to turn the tide against the regime change movement and stabilize the beleaguered country.
Moscow steadily works to replace the leadership void that the US is leaving in the “Greater Middle East”.
By Vadim Truhachev (Russia) Dem. Edward Markey — Chair Deputy of the House Committee for the Natural Resources — claimed that agreement between Rosneft and BP may threaten American national security. According to his opinion, stock exchange may complicate the procedure of fee recovery from the Englishmen. However, I doubt […]
The British Roots Of The Deep State: How The Round Table Infiltrated America
The Strange Case Of Chrystia Freeland And The Failure Of The “Super Elite”
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations
Why China Is Confident It Can Withstand US Pressure?
Israeli Attack On Syria Is A Message For Russia
An ISIS fighter: ‘I was forbidden at the Gates of Heaven…’ (163,856)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (47,117)
A New Twist in the Investigation into Flight MH17 (39,481)
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations (37,006)
Pakistan’s Asymmetrical Response To Trump Is A Clever Way To Flip The Tables On Afghanistan (28,640)
Andrew KORYBKO 
Vladislav SOTIROVIC 
M. K. BHADRAKUMAR 
Binoy KAMPMARK 
Thierry MEYSSAN 
Eric MARGOLIS 
Nikolay STARIKOV 
Vladimir KOZIN 
Fr. Lawrence FARLEY 
Gulam ASGAR MITHA 
Fr. Stephen FREEMAN 
Leonid SAVIN 
Nafeez AHMED 
Michael AVERKO 
Iqbal ALIMOHAMED 
Peter CHAMBERLIN 
Fr. Andrey TKACHEV 
Nauman SADIQ 
Matthew EHRET 
Rick STERLING
Comments