This false flag involved two separate, but interconnected, influence operations through willing journalist participants, the first and most obvious being Babchenko himself – who can be described more as an information provocateur and even a troll instead of a journalist – and the second DC-based individual who laundered the fake pic of Babchenko’s ”assassination”.
This is why the ones who are now so fervently preaching about “shared values” and “Western unity” when faced with the treachery of those natural-gas pipelines and that Eurasian trade route are actually demanding that Europe do itself a disservice by remaining deferential.
Europe cannot cave in to US pressure, but it cannot realistically break ties with Washington when rejecting it, much less lay a claim to the mantle of global leadership. Europe simply wants more independence, which is already asking a lot, given the current state of world affairs. To achieve this, Europe needs to develop a more favorable balance of forces and interests.
The hysterical hype about the supposedly imminent commencement of “World War III” and the nuclear apocalypse that people are being conditioned for manipulative reasons to expect right afterwards never came to pass, but all the same, there’s an unmistakable worldwide struggle going on for the future of International Relations.
The Anglo-Saxon elite that has ruled Britain and half of the world for the last three centuries sees itself as a special caste entitled to special rights. They have never been in the habit of apologizing to anyone.
It seems like the British side is trying to cover up the tracks and destroy all the evidence. In Hollywood movies, criminals act like this when a detective tells them their version is not valid.
It wasn’t the work of the two countries’ diplomats or even US-Russian relations as a whole that took the biggest hit from Washington’s recent decision. The main fallout from Trump’s move might be seen in Vladimir Putin’s new disappointment in him.
This 6-paged document is a powerful evidence of another intellectual low of British propaganda machine. Open it and you can tell that substantially it makes only two assertions on the Skripal case, and both are false.
The officials in Britain are deliberately escalating “hysteria” around the incident with Mr. Skripal so that ordinary Britons could not assess the real consequences for the country’s economy as a result of Brexit implementation.
After having resigned from the European Union, then having refused to sign the Chinese declaration about the Silk Road, the United Kingdom thought to improve its stature by eliminating a competitor. By this piece of dirty work, it imagined that it would acquire a new dimension and become the «Global Britain» announced by Madame May. But it is destroying its own credibility.
Moscow is supposed to not only rein in its offensive geopolitical game, but also become more accommodating when it comes to Ukraine, Syria, and Europe. But since there’s no way the West is going to see any of these dreams come true — what’s the point of putting pressure on Moscow?
There is no legitimate reason for the British authorities to rule out that any of other states possessing Novichok technology (US, Britain, Israel) could have at the very least ‘lost control’ of their nerve agent stockpiles.
The Unpleasant Truth About The 1941 Parachuting Of Rudolf Hess In England (II) (10,303)
The Unpleasant Truth About The 1941 Parachuting Of Rudolf Hess In England (I) (10,151)
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations (5,975)
The Unpleasant Truth About The 1941 Parachuting Of Rudolf Hess In England (III) (5,301)
The Highest Degree Of Certainty: The New Evidence In The Downing Of Flight MH17 (4,978)
An ISIS fighter: ‘I was forbidden at the Gates of Heaven…’ (161,840)
A New Twist in the Investigation into Flight MH17 (38,099)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (35,310)
Pakistan’s Asymmetrical Response To Trump Is A Clever Way To Flip The Tables On Afghanistan (27,587)
What The Guardian Is Afraid Of When Attacking Honest Syria Reporters? (26,307)
Andrew KORYBKO 
Vladislav SOTIROVIC 
Nikolay STARIKOV 
Gulam ASGAR MITHA 
Vladimir KOZIN 
Eric MARGOLIS 
M. K. BHADRAKUMAR 
Fr. Lawrence FARLEY 
Thierry MEYSSAN 
Fr. Stephen FREEMAN 
Michael AVERKO 
Peter CHAMBERLIN 
Fr. Andrey TKACHEV 
Nauman SADIQ 
Adam GARRIE 
Sophie MANGAL 
Iqbal ALIMOHAMED 
Oliver RICHARDSON 
Matthew COOPER 
Nafeez AHMED
Comments