The strategic purpose of weaponizing this innuendo in the modern Chinese context is that the US has been ceaselessly trying to rally Muslim countries against the People’s Republic on the 1980s Afghan War-like grounds that it’s an “atheist dictatorship suppressing Islam” and therefore deserves to be responded to in a multilateral fashion through an “Ummah”-wide militant jihad.
Apart from the intra-“Ummah” soft power rivalry between Turkey and Saudi Arabia, as well as Ankara’s traditional sensitivity to Turkish-related affairs anywhere in Eurasia, there are also domestic reasons why Turkey’s Foreign Minister brought up his country’s stance towards Xinjiang again.
The Genocidal Roots of the Green New Deal: The Limits to Growth and the Unchaining of Prometheus
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations
Jacques Hogard: British SAS And Americans Were Attacking Serbs
The British Roots Of The Deep State: How The Round Table Infiltrated America
Why Has The West Destroyed Its Own Industrial Base?
An ISIS fighter: ‘I was forbidden at the Gates of Heaven…’ (164,311)
Grandmaster Putin’s Trap (47,135)
A New Twist in the Investigation into Flight MH17 (39,527)
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and its Consequences for International Relations (39,183)
Pakistan’s Asymmetrical Response To Trump Is A Clever Way To Flip The Tables On Afghanistan (28,644)
Andrew KORYBKO 
Vladislav SOTIROVIC 
Binoy KAMPMARK 
Thierry MEYSSAN 
Eric MARGOLIS 
Nikolay STARIKOV 
Vladimir KOZIN 
Fr. Lawrence FARLEY 
Fr. Stephen FREEMAN 
Gulam ASGAR MITHA 
Leonid SAVIN 
Nafeez AHMED 
Michael AVERKO 
Matthew EHRET 
Iqbal ALIMOHAMED 
Peter CHAMBERLIN 
Fr. Andrey TKACHEV 
Rick STERLING 
Nauman SADIQ 
Adam GARRIE
Comments